Mark Levinson No. 53 Monaural Power Amp Reviewed
- By: Jerry Del Colliano
- - Reviewer's System
- Category:
- Audio Reviews, Equipment Reviews, Stereo Amplifier Reviews
- Resources & Links:
- Digital Amplifier (Class-D or Switching) ,
- Mark Levinson ,
- Monoblock Amplifier
- December 3, 2008
You know how I know that the Mark Levinson No. 53 power amplifiers are really, really good? No, it's not that they have the Mark Levinson brand on their faceplates or that they cost a whopping $50,000 a pair or that they blew my fragile little mind at a private audition. It's because a handful of industry executives, who have every reason to hate the amps because they sell competing and obnoxiously expensive audiophile amps, can't stop raving about the Mark Levinson No. 53. Heartfelt compliments from your most enthusiastic competitors are a very good sign for future success.The Mark Levinson No. 53 mono amps are designed to replace the historical Mark Levinson No. 33 reference monoblock power amps, which were both physically huge and ultimately somewhat unreliable out in the field. The Mark Levinson No. 53 is a much smaller tower-style design that, under the hood, goes in a new direction. You might be happy to know that the Mark Levinson No. 53, which weighs about as much as a Toyota Prius, is a hybrid digital amplifier design, which means it melds a traditional class AB or class A form with the quiet, clean sound of today's best digital amps. And no, Mark Levinson is not using a B&O Ice amp in their No. 53, like so many others in the digital amplifier market do today. The Mark Levinson No. 53 highlights a new amplifier design called Interleaved Power Technology (IPT), which is likely to trickle down the Mark Levinson line in years to come as it aims to bring the best of both worlds together in one amp.
High Points
• The Mark Levinson No. 53 is the Reese's Peanut Butter Cup of the ultimate audiophile amplifier world, as it brings the best of two things together in one product. In the case of the Mark Levinson No. 53 amps, you get the clean vast power of a digital amplifier with the weight and balls of a class AB amp design. Nobody has brought this to the high end before.
• The Mark Levinson No. 53s are smaller and more reliable than the No. 33s and replace the need for the Mark Levinson No. 33 amps for nearly all consumers worldwide.
Low Points
• The tower configuration of the Mark Levinson No. 53 amp makes it hard (if not impossible) to sell to the non-audiophile who doesn't want big amps on the floor next to his speakers. Yes, it will go over well in Tokyo, but in the United States, people who can actually afford Mark Levinson No. 53s (like Bentley driving, NetJets flying fat cats, a.k.a. the ones who are actually buying stocks in a very down market) would likely want to hide them in a fan-cooled equipment rack. Harman needs to engineer a rack-mountable version of the amp, much like their Mark Levinson No. 436 monoblocks.
Conclusion
Before you make some "I-get-my-audiophile-news-from-some-computer-lover-website-written-by-a-dorky-GenY-kid-who-graduated-college-18-months-ago-and-thinks-a-$199-Blu-ray-player-is-expensive" joke about the price of the Mark Levinson No. 53 amplifiers, you need to appreciate just how insanely good they sound. Look up your local dealer and make sure he is getting a pair and, even if you show up driving a car that costs less than the Mark Levinson No. 53s, make an appointment to hear them. Along with the Halcro dm58s and Krell's Evolution 900 power amplifiers, the Mark Levinson No. 53s are a must-hear and set a benchmark for performance that you need to experience to believe.
Keywords
Mark Levinson No. 53, Mark Levinson No. 53 reviewed, Mark Levinson No. 33, Mark Levinson No. 33h, Mark Levinson No. 436, Mark Levinson power amps, Levinson amp reviews, Harman Specialty group, Hybrid digital amps
- Arcam Solo Integrated Amp and C...
- Audio Research REF 110 Power Am...
- Ayre Acoustics MX-R Monaural Po...
- Bryston 2B SST Stereo Amplifier...
- Classe Audio CA-M400 Mono Ampli...
- Classe' Audio CA-M400 Mono Ampl...
- Copland CTA405 Integrated Ampli...
- Halcro dm38 Stereo Power Amplif...
- Krell Evolution 600 Mono Power ...
- Krell Evolution 900 Monaural Po...
- Krell FBI Integrated Amplifier ...
- Krell KAV-400xi Integrated Ampl...
- Mark Levinson No. 436 Monaural ...
- Mark Levinson No. 53 Monaural P...
- McIntosh MC275 Stereo Power Amp...
- McIntosh MC501 Monaural Power A...
- Melody SP3 Amplifier Reviewed...
- Musical Fidelity Supercharger 5...
- NAD C315BEE Stereo Integrated A...
- NuForce Icon / S1 Amplifier Rev...
- NuForce Reference 9 V2 Special ...
- Parasound Halo JC 1 Monaural Am...
- PrimaLuna 3 and 4 Tube Power Am...
- Quad II-eighty Tube Amplifier R...
- ROTEL RB-1092 Amplifier Reviewe...
- Stereo, Mono and Audiophile Amp...
- Theta Intrepid Amp Reviewed...
Today's Top Story
Can The Home Theater Business Re-price Itself Back Into The Hearts and Wallets of Consumers? -
This recession is a bitch. The talking heads on the Sunday morning shows were shooting off this weekend about the fact that the American economy was headed into recession no matter what, but the collapse of the real estate market... Click for more...
Latest Stereo Amplifier Reviews
McIntosh MC275 Stereo Power Amplifier Reviewed -
McIntosh Laboratories is one of those select companies that have achieved legendary status among audiophiles and discerning listeners. Established in 1949, McIntosh was one of the founders of the high-fidelity audio industry, along with companies like Marantz, Harman Kardon, Fisher,... Click for more...
Theta Intrepid Amp Reviewed -
So dazzling was Theta's first amplifier, the Dreadnaught, that I ended the March, 2000 review with, "It's a ******g masterpiece." But there was a catch, price aside: the Dreadnaught measures an absurd 17.75x8.5x24in deep including the fittings. In my lounge,... Click for more...
Arcam Solo Integrated Amp and CD Player Reviewed -
Before walking into the Arcam room at the January Consumer Electronics Show, I had been primed to expect that 'something awesome' awaited. This in itself raised a smile because I have never heard the words 'Arcam' and 'awesome' in the... Click for more...
PrimaLuna 3 and 4 Tube Power Amp -
Sneaking admiration is something I'm more than willing to offer the wily Herman van den Dungen. The crafty old dog has finessed the PrimaLuna ProLogue line into a comprehensive seven-model range using just one main circuit and the same... Click for more...
ROTEL RB-1092 Amplifier Reviewed -
One hesitates to apply the word 'revolutionary' to a piece of hi-fi equipment because it implies that the product is the first/best/biggest/cheapest/whatever of its type. In the case of Rotel's RB-1092 stereo amplifier, it may or may not be the... Click for more...
Classe Audio CA-M400 Mono Amplifier Reviewed -
In the past decade-plus of reviewing topnotch audiophile and home theater gear, I can think of few products that have caught my attention more than the Classe' Audio CA-M400 monoblock amps. Priced at $5,000 each or, as reviewed, $10,000 per... Click for more...
Parasound Halo JC 1 Monaural Amplifier Reviewed -
When Parasound announced it was releasing a line of products with legendary designer John Curl under the moniker Halo, the press release alone was spank material. At the top of the product line sat the JC1 monaural amplifier, named after... Click for more...
McIntosh MC501 Monaural Power Amplifier Reviewed -
Customer devotion, brand loyalty, cult following, whatever term you choose to describe it - few companies can compare when it comes to the passion exhibited by McIntosh clientele for the firm's products. Many customers simply will not even consider... Click for more...
Mark Levinson No. 53 Monaural Power Amp Reviewed -
You know how I know that the Mark Levinson No. 53 power amplifiers are really, really good? No, it's not that they have the Mark Levinson brand on their faceplates or that they cost a whopping $50,000 a pair or... Click for more...
Ayre Acoustics MX-R Monaural Power Amplifier Reviewed -
Ayre Acoustics are out with new reference monoblock amplifiers that are simply drop-dead gorgeous, competing in the upper echelon of audiophile amplifiers. The $16,500 per pair MX-Rs do not look like your typical audiophile amplifiers. First of all, they... Click for more...




Comment on this article
3I can't wait to hear these, I've been drooling over them since they first showed them a year or so ago.
Umm, Is it Class AB and ... within a Reference Quality level product?
With the exception of the BDP-S1 (I also have the S7700 and S7000 for comparison) in both of our main systems (yes I know we are reviewing audio) SHOULD a con for this level of product be that it can't fit into a equipment rack? I use the Krell 250Ms and would I consider putting them in a rack? If I had 6 of them (5.1 setups), I think tornado like forces would have to be moved to keep them cool under stress. Also, with the flatness of freq of the 53, are the Transparent speaker and interconnects with Xovers within your setup overkill the reason for a ML 53? Sorry, I have the AlphaCore flat coppers (with custom gold plating over copper ) and Acoustic Zen XLRs (1/2M) also the 1Ms/ RCAs. Oh, if we look under the covers why with such a large surface area does ML consider this product to "maintaining a constant, thermally-balanced operating temperature", then why do we care? Does working cooler make it sound better? These are amps designed for the front pair of speakers within the stereo world and maybe some trickle-down can be done for the Multi-channel amps without fans?
No, I don't know how one SHOULD review this product? Actually maybe, drive the most inefficient speakers. Maybe subs (maybe my main speaker subs at about 2ohms at over 100db), in a closed room and see if this thing thermally shuts down. Why does the 33H have a SN of 105 at full output while the 53 has 80 at 1 watt? Are these numbers better than my older 250Ms? So, some comparison with the 33 and/or the 33H would (be) have been nice. But yes, a high-end pre (ML 32) in the mix would be nice, but how far into the diminishing returns are we with this product more than the 33s or my 250Ms? I think my pre (Krell KRC-HR) is my weak-link. So, a review of this product IMO really needs to be what can be built at the say $500k price point and what would be the diffs of that and the $250K price point. Oh, and in reality IMO my CDs and player are really the weak-link because they don't do 40K oversampling and deal with a much smaller bits per sec rate of data than what could be accomplished with todays state-of-the-art data rates.
And for the curious part of my system is the vintage self modified Infinity IRS Betas (custom mid xovers by WIMA, Solen, AlphaCore, etc) (mids driven by the 250Ms or VTL MB 450s) with 8 servo sub channels of Genesis power and/or the Carver Research Lightstar 1 amp. Yes, I have two plus sets of these speakers and.. the Martin Logan Logos center and ML Quest rears, and Revel Gems and Wilson Audio Watts and .. My video is the 50" 1080p plasma Pioneer Elite Kuro.with a pair of Salamander uprights on a simple custom maple stand. Lastly, I do own a older vintage Mark Levinson 23.5 amp (505Watts at 1% on 9/91 by Stereophile) driving the rear Quests.
And still if this product is close (or better) to the 250Ms or 33s or ... , a audible difference is unlikely.
After reading this "review" i was not sure if the reviewer had ever heard them. I don't see any mention to how they sound other than "...you need to appreciate just how insanely good they sound".
How do they sound?
I guess i need to dig around more, after looking at this "review" and the ML web site i missed what the THD and IM distortion is.
Post a Comment