What Defines an AV Receiver These Days Anyway?

Subscribe to our FREE weekly newsletter Print this article

TheAVReceiver_Redefined.gif

In the old days a "receiver" was roughly defined as an AV component that included a preamp, an internal power amp and some form of AM/FM tuner all in one chassis. While integrated amps (a preamp and amp all in one unit without the tuner) were a little more respected in the audiophile community - many of us got our first start at high performance audio via a receiver of some sort. My first receiver was an NAD that ultimately was used as a make-shift audiophile preamp as my system grew when I was a teenager in prep school back in Philadelphia. Since those days, the receiver has transformed into a completely different beast today.

Ask any male Baby Boomer where he grew up and which FM radio station he listened to and you will nearly always get an enthusiastic response. In the late 1960's and early 1970's my father was the program director for the two coolest AM and FM rock-pop stations in the Philadelphia market - WIFL and WIBG. Many people his age still think back fondly to listening to all of the incredible music of the day from Jimi Hendrix to The Beatles to Motown to Aerosmith, Led Zeppelin and so much more. This music was broadcast free of charge and wirelessly. Via terrestrial FM radio hundreds of Americans got a viable source for music (albeit not a very high resolution one) especially new music that was incredibly culturally relevant. In Europe during the same period, FM radio programming was even better than in the United States with great shows, live programming and arguably better audio which all resulted in an even more loyal following for FM radio than in the States. Globally by the 1970s FM radio content was a must-have in any mainstream or even performance based audio system thus the generation-long love affair with the AV receiver.

With the meteoric rise in popularity in home theater in the very late 1970's paired with the success of Dolby surround sound and the VHS tape recorder - AV receivers added even more functionality including surround sound processing, video switching and more. As AV systems became more digital they now switched, processed and dealt with more and more sophisticated sources while still always remaining faithful to their AM/FM roots. AV receivers evolved and consumers ate up the new feature sets while upgrading their systems year after year.

Roll the tape forward to 1996 and the deregulation of terrestrial radio in the United States - we saw American radio boom right along with the dotcom companies that were so popular in the day. And like so-many of their dotcom brethren - radio consolidators have busted like a degenerate gambler on the worst of Las Vegas binges. Stocks of once mighty radio companies are now worth mere pennies a share - with many reportedly close to bankruptcy today. Radio stations that once sold for 16 times "top line" one-year revenue can barely sell for one-time yearly revenue. Howard Stern, the backbone of the FM talk dynasty at CBS-Infinity, is now the strongest draw at pay-satellite radio provider at Sirius-XM satellite radio. As an industry, many radio programming critics argue that there hasn't been a meaningful new terrestrial radio format since "Arrow" (which was really a 1970's rock oldies format) in over 25 years. Terrestrial radio once one of the most mighty of mainstream medias just a decade or two ago - is today deader than a doornail.

With radio solidly festering in the proverbial new media shitcan - today AV receivers are asked to do more and more hard work. Switching HDCP copy protected HDMI signals is no small technical feat. Processing HD audio codecs from Blu-ray discs like Dolby TrueHD and DTS Master Audio are even more intense yet this doesn't even cover the scope of today's AV receivers. Increasingly, today's under-$1,000 receivers are adding satellite radio as an included feature. Now these same receivers are becoming network devices that speak to other computers, hard drives, cell phones and other devices throughout the home via wireless protocols as well as connections such as Bluetooth.

Today, AV receivers have transcended their traditional role and for most American AV consumers represent the hearth and soul of your home entertainment system as it increasingly is fed "on-demand" "pay-per-view" and HD downloaded content while being controlled by the likes of an Apple iPod touch via wireless or Bluetooth connection.

The radio industry thinks they have a comeback in them. They are dead wrong. Radio and the music business executives are quick to blame Napster and other peer-to-peer file sharing systems for their troubles yet ask any Howard Stern fan how much better the show is (even paying $12 per month) without the 14 minute commercial sets twice an hour. The music industry's long and nasty divorce with FM radio has forced music enthusiasts and today's youth to other media to find new places and formats to buy new music. No company has benefited from this phenomenon more from this than Apple Computer who today can wirelessly connect every media file you have in your house (even some 720p HD files) to your home theaters, HDTVs and other locations with the ultimate level of ease of use that only Apple can deliver.

Considering the fact that I have never actually over from satellite to the FM radio in my car for the two years that I have owned it - I ask the question: with all of the processing power needed to manage today's complex home theater systems - is it time to consider leaving AM-FM tuners out of next generation AV receivers? Clearly receivers "receive" a lot more than analog terrestrial radio. Do consumers really care if you get your local FM station in your next receiver assuming you might have access to say 1,000 plus Internet Radio stations instead for the same money. Even if you must still have your AM and FM in your system - there is no question the definition of what an AV receiver is today has changed radically even in the last year.

  • Comment on this article

  • By Michael Biel

Jerry -- As one of your father's generation -- in fact I was a college buddy of your father's and engineered almost all of his radio productions at Temple -- I recognize myself in your descriptions of how we relate to radio as far as music is concerned. I watched with dismay as the radio consolidators (including several of my students) ruined localism in radio and am overjoyed in how it has come back to bite them. And I too listen to XM because I get no local info on radio like I should. But there are those times when you do need the local stations, and maybe they will again earn some status that will make it necessary to retain AM/FM capacity in receivers. But my main point in writing (besides saying Hi) is to differ with your comparison of U.S. and European FM in the 70s. I agree that their FM might have sounded better than ours, but there also was an exaggerated contrast between AM and FM sound quality in Europe compared to the U.S. In Europe AM stations were required to filter audio at 4.5 KHz while in the U.S. stations had no such restriction then and routinely had audio on AM out to 12 or 14 KHz. This led to the radio manufacturers reducing the bandwidth of their AM sections in the U.S. to cut out adjacent and second-adjacent splattering, but Europe never had that splatter problem. But somehow FM did not hit popularity in many European countries until the mid to late 80s. In England I visited Radio Brighton in 1983 and they gave me a 7-inch record they issued as part of their largely unsuccessful campaign to get people to listen to them on "VHF-FM" instead of Medium Wave AM. It was like back in the 60s here in the U.S. when the only way to promote FM was for the FCC to require AM-FM stations to air different programming. Actually, Philadelphia led the way in FM receiver penetration because there already were so many good FM-only stations while the AM stations were universally crappy! I grew up in NYC where we had so many good AM stations that people did not need to use FM because there were relatively few FM-only stations worth hearing until the FCC required programming split. I was amazed at how easy it was to find people with FM radios when I came to Phila for college and worked (with your father) on our FM station. FM in Europe didn't hit it big until the mid-80s when the governments allowed the licensing of non-governmental FM-only stations, and pirate stations also switched over from AM to FM. And that pace varied from country to country.

  • By Derek R. Flickinger

Jerry,

I also grew up outside of Philadelphia (and have since moved back here). I listened to the same radio stations growing up (although I remember the one as WFIL). It took me forever to figure out that you pronounce WIBG as wibbage. In fact, my brother still has some albums from the DJs at WIBG in addition to most of the "Philly Soul" 45s (remember the Phil-A-of-Soul label?). Anyhow, thanks for the memories.

Derek R. Flickinger
Interactive Homes, Inc.
Drexel Hill, PA

  • By Tim

You know, those of you who write like this have no soul, no romance, no feeling of youth. Today's receivers are mostly black with faint digital displays and remotes that are engineered to frustrate the "user," not the listener. I have had several of these incarnations over the years and while I appreciate home theater and love movies, the heart of any good "system" is music. I have had no receiver over the last 25 years that compared to the Marantz's, Pioneers, and Technics of the late 1960's and into the 1970's. Music "provided" via the Internet is not high fidelity and if anyone under 40 heard a great turntable with a great "real" receiver and good speakers then they would realize what I ma talking and see what they are missing in pure enjoyment and not convenience.

  • By Todd

As much as I hate to admit it, the author is on to something here. I have owned only one receiver and this was for ease of home theater implementation. All previous systems have included either a separate tuner or a pre/amp tuner though. The funny thing is that I recall only once hooking up an antenae to any system. I either listen to CDs, watch movies or listen to the digital music that cable and/or satellite provides. There is a use for am/fm in the car possibly, but I have to admit I never listened to terrestial radio prior to my free trial of XM running out. I even re-upped one time after I began to miss some of the comedy channels. I will have to say that the SQ was less than adequate with satellite music though.

  • By earl

. One need only look to the right margin commercials to see that the av receiver has changed. Are the manufacturers starting trends or giving the masses want them what they want? The times they are a changing. For hard evidence go to a Best Buy and try to find a stereo receiver

Post a Comment

You are encouraged to post your comments using Facebook on HomeTheaterReview.com. Simply sign in to your Facebook account below and post away.

Featured Audio-Video News

The Evolution of the Two-Channel Preamp

The Evolution of the Two-Channel Preamp -

The two-channel preamp has been due for an overhaul for a while now and it seems that the process is beginning with several of the new products hitting the market from several of the major manufacturers. But why is it happening now?

Latest AV Receiver News

NAD Delivers 3D-Capable T 748 AV Receiver -

NAD Electronics have delivered the T 748 AV receiver, a model that promises to be simple in operations and robust in performance, while still being very affordable to the modern consumer.

Yamaha Releases New Flagship AV Receiver: RX-V871 -

Yamaha has decided to release a new flagship AV receiver for the RX-V line. This receiver is the RX-V871, and it comes packed with every features that the company could think to pack in one box.

Yamaha Adds Connectivity to AVENTAGE AV Receivers -

Yamaha continues to improve upon the company's AVENTAGE line by adding more connectivity options so users will have more choices when it comes to listening to music the way they want to.

NAD Releases T 757 Surround Sound Receiver -

NAD Electronics has released a brand new AV receiver, the T 757, which features a lot of the standard features of modern AV receivers, as well as many interesting and unique features all its own.

Integra Introduces Four Network AV Receivers for Custom Installation -

Integra has released four new AV Receivers: the DTR-20.3, DTR-30.3, DTR-40.3, and DTR-50.3. These new receivers come packed with a list of features that seems to just go on and on.

Onkyo Introduces Receiver with New DTS Neo:X Technology -

Onkyo wanted to be first out of the gate on a new technology for their new new TX-NR1009 AV receiver and they succeeded. The new receiver is the first to feature the new DTS Neo:X technology.

Audyssey Creates a New Mode for AV Receivers -

Audyssey, a name that has become very famous for the company's EQ programs to help users balance the sound in their rooms, has designed yet another piece of software to help with controlling sound in your system.

Onkyo Announces New Networking TX-NR809 AV Receiver -

Onkyo announces their brand new, very feature rich, TX-NR809 AV receiver. The new receiver features a huge list of features, not the least of which is several different network-capable options.

Denon 2011 Lineup Adds New Connectivity Options -

The latest new products from Denon are available led by a line of audio/video receivers in the company's IN-Command Series which offers consumers new networking capabilities, flexibility, performance and reliability

Yamaha Launches AV Receiver Line with Apple Integration and Affordability -

Yamaha has released four new moderately priced receivers which allow users to access Internet radio and free and paid music streaming services like Rhapsody, Pandora and Napster