Cambridge Audio Azur 751BD Blu-ray Universal Player Reviewed

By |

Cambridge Audio Azur 751BD Blu-ray Universal Player Reviewed

Page 1 Page 2

Cambridge_Audio_Azur_751BD_Blu-ray_player_review_on_black.jpgIn terms of soundstage, the 751BD truly did the recording proud, in that it was able to extract every last ounce of detail and inject it into the performance, giving me a truer sense of the recording space and of the musicians within it. Speaking of detail, there just seemed to be more of it via the 751BD, in that subtle nuances, such as the irregular quiver of a guitar's string or the reverberation of sound within a double bass' hollowed body, were presented with far more authority and focus than what I've experienced in players of this type or price in the past. Truthfully, as a two-channel source, relying solely on its internal DACs, I view the 751BD's performance as nothing short of reference quality at its price point and even a few ticks above.

Speaking of the 751BD's internal DACs, I found them to be superior to what is offered in the Integra DHC-80.2, for when feeding a digital signal to the Integra for it to decode, the sound became vague, recessed and cloudy in comparison. On the flip side, sending a two-channel digital signal to my reference DAC-2 provided subtle (emphasis on subtle) improvements, but the 751BD's sound did lose a bit of its body and midrange warmth. What it did gain was a bit of low-end focus and top-end shimmer but again, the differences were mild at best. In terms of soundstage and dynamic performance, the DAC-2 imparted a bit more space between the performers and seemed to yield a touch more energy to the beginning of certain notes and vocals, but the differences are difficult to quantify beyond that. I will say this: I didn't view the addition of the DAC-2 as so much an upgrade as it was just a change. If I didn't already have the DAC-2, I could just as easily live with the 751BD on its own, for its two-channel performance is exemplary. 


Moving on to SACDs, I cued up an oldie but a goodie in Miles Davis' Kind of Blue (Columbia) and the track "So What." The double bass was oh so subtle, but still clearly present. It sort of snuck up on you, giving it an almost playfully haunting vibe that gradually grows louder and closer, which the 751BD captured brilliantly. Still, the texture contained within each subdued pluck of the strings was captivating. The cymbals were equally impressive, possessing the same nuance as the low bass notes, but adding sweetness up top that was rife with natural air and decay. Miles' trumpet sprang to life and was placed firmly in the center of the soundstage, with clear space between him and the other musicians, horizontally as well as vertically. Miles' trumpet was brassy without being "shouty" or aggressive. The entire presentation, despite the clarity of SACD, still had a sort of period swagger to it that felt true to life, as if to suggest the sound was playing amidst the clouds of cigarette smoke that must have been swirling about the recording space.

Switching gears to movies, I went with James Cameron's Titanic on DVD (Paramount). I'm normally not a fan of upscaling. I find it is often akin to putting lipstick on a pig; you're not changing the fact that it's still a pig. DVD will never be HD. Period. The end. This being said, with the 751BD's 1080p upscaling in full effect, it appears you can get close -real close. Truthfully, minus some minor noise in low light and dark regions of the screen, such as the hull of the ship itself or the boiler room, the brighter scenes possessed HD-like clarity. Turning the upscaling off (which can be done on the fly) revealed just how good the 751BD's video processing was. for the un-scaled image appeared soft and somewhat muddy in comparison. Colors were vivid but natural, retaining the film's romance and sheen up until it was time for the boat to sink, when the cool, steely blue hues stood out in stark contrast to the film's otherwise warm palette. Motion was smooth throughout, with only minor judders visible on some of the film's more complex and longer-lasting tracking shots. Edge fidelity was also excellent, possessing near-HD levels of sharpness, especially in the film's many close-up shots. I've demoed and spent time with a number of video processors, and I have to say that the Marvell Qdeo processor is among the best I've seen in bridging the gap between SD and HD -those of you with rather large DVD libraries should take special note.

In terms of its sound quality, the 751BD proved to as adept at multi-channel surround sound formats as it was with two-channel and SACD. Dialogue, like the vocal tracks before, was clear as day, with a sure-footedness that placed the actors firmly in space, not only on screen but in the room. The 751BD's surround sound performance was terrific, as was its ability to extract every last ounce of detail from the mix, bringing with it a greater sense of ambience. Truthfully, it was like being given secondary colors with which to paint; the aural tapestry was just that much richer.

I ended my evaluation of the 751BD with the Robert Redford-directed film The Conspirator (Lionsgate) on Blu-ray. This period-accurate drama about the assassination of Abraham Lincoln may not have set box office records, but it's a hell of a home theater demo, especially if you're looking to test low-light and black-level detail, as the film looks as though it is lit almost entirely by natural light and/or candlelight. On my calibrated Panasonic plasma, the 751BD's low-light detail rendering was spot on and its black levels superb. The constant shadow play caused by the ever-present candlelight in many of the film's interior scenes showcased the 751BD's contrast and ability to resolve subtle detail. Even in the darkest regions of any given frame, noise levels were kept to a minimum, minus of course the natural grain structure of the film itself, which was not robbed by the 751BD. Colors were again natural, even more so than in my demo of Titanic, for very little stylization was brought to bear on the film, aside from the period-accurate methods used to light each scene. Skin tones were beautifully rendered, as was the detail found in many of the older actors' eyes, mouths and facial hair. While the film as a whole is softer in tone than many of today's super-slick summer blockbusters, there was still a sharpness to the image via the 751BD that lent a truer sense of dimension than what I've experienced through other players.

In terms of its surround sound performance, once again the 751BD was exemplary in recreating the aural landscape necessary to accompany the image and transport the viewer to the film's particular time and place. The tonal quality was always inviting, with just the slightest hint of warmth throughout, which brought a welcome sense of weight and, more importantly, humanity to dialogue tracks. I sometimes turn my HDTV off when evaluating a player's Blu-ray performance, for it's easy to get so wrapped up in the visuals that it's possible to overlook certain aspects of the sound and vice-versa. It's true that sound is half of the picture, but one doesn't want to be thrown off if only given the sound to digest. Sure, the overall experience was better when sound and image were working together, but the 751BD is so good at recreating the essence behind every emotion that the action on screen could still be followed even when the screen itself was off.

From CDs to Blu-rays and literally everything in between, there was little if anything that I found fault with in regard to the 751BD's audio/video performance. It is without a doubt one of the finest Blu-ray players I've ever encountered.

Cambridge_Audio_Azur_751BD_Blu-ray_player_review_inside.jpgThe Downside
From a performance standpoint, there was little I found to object to with the 751BD. This being said, there were a few items that I thought could be improved upon in future iterations, starting with the 751BD's lack of internal wi-fi. I appreciate Cambridge supplying a wi-fi dongle rather than forcing consumers to buy one separately, but with so many players (even cheaper ones) including built-in wi-fi as standard, I feel the 751BD should have it, too.

Audiophiles are bound to harp on the 751BD's lack of balanced audio outs, at least for two-channel listening, which I can understand, though I didn't personally need this feature. Balanced connection options, along with built-in wi-fi, are two of the biggest reasons I could see consumers siding with the Oppo BDP-95 over the 751BD, for the BDP-95 has both.

Lastly, the drive inside the 751BD is louder than I expected, especially when playing back Blu-ray discs. It's not so loud as to draw attention to itself during quiet passages, but it is loud enough that, upon startup and during loading times (the 751BD loads quickly), you can hear its subtle low drone.

Competition and Comparison
Obviously, the biggest competition the 751BD faces is from the Oppo BDP-95, which I've spoken about and already compared it to at length. Sure, there are other universal players out there, some far cheaper than either the 751BD or BDP-95, but for a true apples to apples comparison, these are the only two players in the conversation. While it would be easy for one to look at the BDP-95's feature set and see the subtle differences between it and the 751BD and conclude that for $999 it was the better player, I'd urge you not to do so. Not that I think the BDP-95 is a horrible player, hell, it was Home Theater Review's Product of the Year, it's just the two are more evenly matched, at least in terms of audio and video performance, than most people realize.

It is my opinion that those who are looking for a more "analog" sound, one that has a slightly richer tonal quality throughout, will most likely side with the Cambridge, whereas those who are looking for something a bit more neutral or perhaps lively, dare I say lean, will no doubt side with the Oppo. From a video standpoint, there is little that I can see on paper or on a screen that differentiates the two players minus built-in wi-fi, some streaming capabilities and slightly more internal memory storage: 2GB as opposed to 1GB in the 751BD. So what the decision really comes down to is personal taste, for the price difference (if there is any, thanks to the Internet) are not enough to be a deciding factor, at least not for me.

While I generally love what Oppo is doing and think they've single-handedly revolutionized the concept of what makes a high-end source component, I don't personally own any Oppo products nor have I for quite some time. Why, you ask? Maybe I'm cursed, but I haven't had the best of luck regarding Oppo and their reliability, for every Oppo product I've owned has broken or had some sort of glitch that has impacted my ability to enjoy it as a whole. Having lived with the 751BD for several months now, I can say that no such issues have arisen with it, which is why, if it were my money, I'd side with Cambridge.

Again, with players this closely matched, it simply boils down to personal taste. For more on these two players, as well as other universal players like them, please visit Home Theater Review's Blu-ray Player page.

Cambridge_Audio_Azur_751BD_Blu-ray_player_review_angled.jpgConclusion
I'll get right to it: the Cambridge Audio Azur 751BD Blu-ray Universal Disc Player is brilliant. Even though its retail price of $1,249 may seem a bit high, in my eyes, it is worth every penny, for I don't view the 751BD's asking price as anything short of a high-end bargain, as you're essentially getting seven unique products in one: a CD, SACD, HDCD, DVD, DVD-Audio, Blu-ray and Blu-ray 3D player. Take $1,249, divide it by the number of formats the 751BD affords you the ability to enjoy, and it works out to be less than $200 each. I can't think of any truly high-end-sounding CD players that cost less than $200, let alone any that manage to play DVDs and Blu-rays as well. Factor in what the 751BD brings to the table in terms of its video processing and ... oh, you get the idea.

While the concept of having a universal player is nothing entirely new, I've yet to encounter one that performs at such a high level across the board as does the 751BD, save maybe the Oppo BDP-95. While the Oppo is clearly the reigning king of universal players, it doesn't mean there isn't room for one more. Unlike the Lexicon BD-30, the Cambridge Audio Azur 751BD is upfront about its origins and, with this honesty, manages to demystify the Oppo a bit, for both players share similar beginnings without one having to be responsible for the other.

So which to choose? Variety is the spice of life and, as with any audio/video component. it all comes down to personal taste, which for me means the Cambridge Audio Azur 751BD, for it's among the finest disc spinners I've ever heard.

Additional Resources
• Read more Blu-ray player reviews written by HomeTheaterReview.com's staff.
• Find an AV Receiver to pair with the Cambridge Audio Azur 751 BD.
• Explore reviews for LED HDTVs and Plasma HDTVs.

Page 1 Page 2

HTR Product Rating for Cambridge Audio Azur 751BD Blu-ray Universal Player

Criteria Rating

Performance

5

Value

5

Overall

5

Disagree with our product rating? Email us and tell us why you think this product should receive a higher rating.


Latest Blu-ray Player Reviews

Jun 11
Kaleidescape Strato 4K Movie Player Reviewed Kaleidescape has had a very eventful existence. The company that has become synonymous with the high-end movie server spent its...
Kaleidescape Strato 4K Movie Player Reviewed

May 14
Sony UBP-X700 Ultra HD Blu-ray Player Reviewed Adrienne Maxwell reviews Sony's $200 UBP-X700, the lowest priced Ultra HD Blu-ray player in Sony's line. It omits some features found in the higher-priced models but adds support for Dolby Vision.
Sony UBP-X700 Ultra HD Blu-ray Player Reviewed

Mar 12
Xbox One X Gaming Console Reviewed Adrienne Maxwell auditions the Xbox One X gaming console to answer the question, "Can it serve as your complete all-in-one media player?"
Xbox One X Gaming Console Reviewed

Dec 18
Home Theater Review's Best of 2017 Awards It's that time of year again--when the HomeTheaterReview.com staff looks at all of the products we reviewed this year and picks the best of the best. We've tried to hit all the product categories and price points. We hope you enjoy our Best of 2017 list.
Home Theater Review's Best of 2017 Awards

Aug 21
LG UP970 Ultra HD Blu-ray Player Reviewed Adrienne Maxwell reviews the UP970, LG's first entry in the Ultra HD Blu-ray category. The UP970 is the first sub-$300 player scheduled to support Dolby Vision HDR, but it lacks other features found in similarly priced players.
LG UP970 Ultra HD Blu-ray Player Reviewed