Carver Silver Seven Mono Vacuum Tube Power Amplifier Reviewed

By |

Page 1 Page 2

Carver_Silver Seven_amp.png

The Sound Of $1650-Worth Of 6550s�Price shouldn't influence a reviewer or a civilian listener when�assessing any product; it should only determine the final�value-for-money rating and whether or not it fits a budget.�Although the Silver Seven may not be the dearest amplifier on the�planet, it's the costliest I've ever used in my review system and�it took a bit of effort to force myself into dismissing the�influence of the price tag. Then again, I wasn't presupposing

that the 'Seven would be all that marvellous, because I wasn't�expecting the performance to match the overwhelming appearance or�price tag. After all, Bob Carver's main achievements have been in�the middle market, and I had no reason to believe that a slap in�the face from the US press was enough to drive him to levels of�sheer brilliance.

Boy, was I wrong. Even before the 'Seven had driven the mercury�up a degree or three, I was finding my face locked in a�grin/rictus. All of those 'chill factor' criteria were met, the�amplifier delivering a flood of 'you are there' touches of the�type that would have J Gordon Holt hopping with glee. Aside from�imagining Bob Carver with a balloon over his head reading 'I told�you so', the Silver Seven -- regardless of the speaker to which�it was attached -- proved itself to be audibly superior to any�amplifier in my arsenal or in recent memory. But before I get to�the inevitable caveats , let me try to describe what this�amplifier does for the music.

However 'classic' the sound is meant to be, it has lower�registers unlike any vintage valve amplifier I can recall. Modern�designs I've heard (regardless of their chosen technology) which
approach or match the Carver include the larger Audio Research�amplifiers, most of the Krells, the big Rowlands, the Mark�Levinson monoblocks and the Goldmund; note that none of these are�'inexpensive', so such low-end control and extension does not�come cheap. If the bass does betray either its tube origins or�Carver's avowed intentions, then it's only through a slight�richness which absent from the solid-state designs mentioned�above.

The vice-like control and the richness continue with absolute�consistency up into the midband, where the latter starts to fade�out in exchange for greater neutrality. I don't know how�deliberate is Carver's sonic 'tailoring', but he managed to make�the richness dissolve by the point where it's already stamped the�sound with valve status, at the same time not allowing it to�intrude into the all-important midband. The inaccurate (though�undeniably pleasing) extra warmth heard on acoustic instruments�and vocals played through vintage tube products is absent in the�'Seven's performance -- a good thing as more and more time passes
from the days when most audiophiles lived with vintage gear and�would be prepared to forgive such euphonic distortions.

As for the treble, it's the same recipe: transient attack to�rival the fastest, most authoritative solid state devices you can�name, with the sweetness (but not the tubby lushness) of the tube�legends. However much it strikes me as dealing with mutually�exclusive virtues, Carver has managed to juggle the old and the�new with greater skill than I've yet experienced. Just as�impressive as the tonal neutrality, though, is the manner of�presentation, for the Carver has holographic capabilities�(dictionary rather than 'Sonic Holography' definition) on a par
with the very best.

'Tall', 'wide' and 'deep' are only part of the story. The spatial�characteristics also include uncanny precision and a seamlessness�that avoids overetched, 'Viewmaster'-style landscapes. In this�arena, the 'Seven has a few rivals bearing Audio Research, Krell�and (when they're working) Jadis badges, so the Carver hasn't�really pushed the boundaries in 3D terms. But rest assured that�it's world class. But if it is compromise or weakness that you�need to read about, then I should mention the way the Apogee�Divas (not the Stages) rendered the 'Seven a bit breathless.

Whatever the power rating, this amplifier is not the gutsiest�beast I've ever used. While the Diva was the only speaker in my�possession to expose some limitations in the Carver's dynamic�capabilities, I have knowledge of a few dozen other speakers�which are just as demanding. True, they, too, could be avoided,�but all are natural candidates for the 'Seven. Indeed, the�majority of high end speaker builders assume that their products�will be mated to powerful amplifiers. Normal levels were no�problem, but playing hardball is not this amplifier's forte. The�Aragon 4004 at 1/10th the price offered greater levels and no�compression or clipping with demanding material like large�orchestral works and sonic showstoppers.

But that doesn't stop me from regarding the Silver Seven as one�of the very finest amplifiers money can buy. The big chuckle,�though, is the price, which means that the Silver Seven is as�much a marketing tool as it is a hi-fi statement, however�undeniable and real its standard-setting virtues. Which leads us�to...


'T' Is For Tiny
Earlier in this review, I mentioned Carver's 'Transfer Function�Matching'. Quite obviously, the #1900 per pair, solid-state�Silver Seven T monoblock is conceived to be the poor man's Silver
Seven, right down to the 'steam punk' styling. Somewhere, I read�or heard that this amplifier was supposed to deliver '90% of the�Silver Seven's performance for 10% of the cost'. Hmmm...

Rated at a 550W per side, the Silver Seven T is said to duplicate�the 'transfer function of the Silver Seven'. Using Carver's�Magnetic Field design circuitry, it actually pumps out more�watts, can drive 2 ohm loads, weighs only 7.2kg per side (as�opposed to the Silver Seven's 68kg), takes up floor space of only�370x292mm and looks just as wonderful. The controls are limited�to an on/off switch at the front, while the rear sports the�five-way posts I wish were on the Silver Seven.

This amplifier is notorious for having received one of the worst�reviews ever published. I think I understand why, though the amp�is by no means ready for display at Crufts. Basically, Carver was�silly for hyping this as a poor man's 'Seven because even those�who haven't heard the 'Sevens would therefore expect something so�far beyond the 'norm' that the wee Carver would have had to�perform miracles. Inevitably, the 'T lacks the absolute�transparency, the delicate treble, the coherence and the�authority in the lower registers of the 'Seven, but none would�have minded so much had Carver not declared it to be a�near-clone. Indeed, it has exceptional stage width,�better-than-average depth, reasonable bass extension and -- with�certain cone-type loudspeakers at least -- enough slam to suggest�that its power rating is indicative of its performance.

However poorly it fared with the Diva, the 'T worked nicely�enough with the Stages to make me wish that I hadn't (1) reviewed�it side-by-side with the 'Seven and (2) heard Carver's claims.�And I could only register dismay when the 'T failed to prove�adequate when asked to drive the ATC SCM20 'mini' monitors. I'd�rather not dredge up the hoary old debate which started with�Carver's Cube of some 10 years back, with its astronomical power�ratings and about as much guts as Charles Hawtrey. The 'T, also�endowed with 'Magnetic Field' technology, also seems to perform�less like a 500-watter than one would expect. It simply lacked�the slam I associate with amplifiers from the Aragon 4004 on up.

But I can't trash the amp because I did manage to find speakers�with which it mated beautifully, the Monitor Audio Studio 10 for�example never causing the 'T to turn harsh or to sound�'over-driven'. But just as the Silver Seven sounded like a�thoroughbred whatever the speaker, so did the 'T seem less than�authoritative through all but the smaller monitors. It suggests�that the 'T does not want to do too much work below 60-80Hz (the�effective lower limits of most small boxes), in which case the 'T�should be auditioned with this in mind.

Let's face it: The betubed Silver Seven is simply a 'dream'�amplifier. At its frightening price, it's amazing that over 50�sets have been sold. Even Carver will admit that it's a flagship,�like Infinity's IRS, designed to call attention to the rest of�the range. That both the Carver Silver Seven and Infinity IRSes�do sell is simply a bonus. But the 'T is the first off-shoot, and�it does not succeed in bringing the 'Seven Experience' to the�masses. It's simply a good, if undistinguished amplifier.

Because the 'T is so aesthetically adorable --'retro-tech' like�the Olympus 'O Product' camera or Mazda's Miata roadster -- it�will probably sell to the same people (and that includes me) who�buy 1930s styled pens or watches or cameras. But that doesn't�help those of you who want a taste of the Silver Seven's glory at�a lower tariff. For that, you'll have to wait for the forthcoming�Silver Six, or investigate the first of the company's tubed�pre-amps. Amusingly, Carver's first valve control centre is not a�high-end piece but a #950 unit within reach of the same people�who'd consider Naim or Exposure or Musical Fidelity; its high-end�counterpart will follow later.

As for that showpiece Silver Seven, well, whatever the sins or�graces of its progeny, it is simply a milestone in high-end�design. I can't flat-out say that it's the world's best amplifier
because I haven't heard every amp available (nor has anyone�else). Indeed, if anyone ever tells you that any single product�is the best of its type, be highly suspicious and change to
another shop or magazine. But I'll tell you this: The Silver�Seven, like most Ferraris, actually performs on a par with its�aesthetic presence. When you first see the four chassis, you
can't help but grin. You realise that here is a product made�truly without any constraints. It's audiophilia gone berserk.�Then you listen. After you recover, you realise that rampant
audiophilia isn't so crazy after all.

Additional Resources
� Read�more stereo amplifier reviews�on HomeTheaterReview.com.
� Find�an AV receiver�to pair with this amplifier.

Page 1 Page 2

HTR Product Rating for Carver Silver Seven Mono Vacuum Tube Power Amplifier

Criteria Rating

Performance

5

Value

3

Overall

4

Disagree with our product rating? Email us and tell us why you think this product should receive a higher rating.


Latest Amplifier Reviews

Dec 30
Denon PMA-150H Integrated Network Amplifier Reviewed Denon's PMA-150H Integrated Network Amplifier with HEOS ($1,099) lends some credibility to an argument I've been making for a few...
Denon PMA-150H Integrated Network Amplifier Reviewed

Dec 09
Home Theater Review's Best of 2019 Awards As 2019 comes to a close, we at HomeTheaterReview.com look back at all the products we reviewed this year and pick the best of the bunch, from affordable favorites to flagship products that make us drool.
Home Theater Review's Best of 2019 Awards

Oct 23
Dan D'Agostino Master Audio Systems Progression Stereo Amplifier The Dan D'Agostino Master Audio Systems Progression Stereo Amplifier ($22,000) is a true powerhouse built on a full-sized chassis measuring...
Dan D'Agostino Master Audio Systems Progression Stereo Amplifier

Sep 23
Technics SU-G700 Stereo Integrated Amplifier Reviewed Technics is a brand that has been with us seemingly forever, and as a result there is no shortage of...
Technics SU-G700 Stereo Integrated Amplifier Reviewed

Sep 04
Krell Chorus 5200 XD Five Channel Amplifier Reviewed My first experience with Krell's iBias technology was when I reviewed the company's entry-level Theater 7 multichannel home theater amplifier....
Krell Chorus 5200 XD Five Channel Amplifier Reviewed