The Samsung Freestyle 2nd Gen Smart Projector brings innovation to portable projection with its distinctive cylindrical design weighing just 1.8 pounds—less than half the weight of the Epson. Where Samsung truly differentiates itself is in setup convenience and flexibility, featuring auto keystone correction, auto focus, and auto leveling that make positioning virtually effortless compared to the Epson's more manual adjustment process. Perhaps most impressive is the Samsung's ability to operate on battery power via compatible USB-C power banks or Samsung's optional battery base, enabling true cord-free usage for outdoor movie nights or locations without convenient power access. The 180° rotation capability allows projection onto ceilings or floors without special mounting hardware—versatility the Epson simply can't match.
While the Samsung comes with a premium price tag ($800-900 versus the Epson's $600-700 range), it offers unique features that justify the cost for certain users. Samsung's Tizen OS provides a clean, responsive interface with Gaming Hub for cloud gaming without requiring a console. The ambient mode transforms the projector into a mood light or digital art display when not watching content, and the optional light socket adapter enables installation in standard E26 light sockets for creative placement options. Where the Samsung falls significantly behind the Epson is in brightness (550 lumens versus 1,200) and audio performance, making it less suitable for rooms with ambient light or users wanting robust built-in sound. For those who value extreme portability, flexible placement options, and the ability to project without power outlets over raw image brightness, the Samsung offers capabilities the Epson doesn't address.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Samsung Freestyle 2nd Gen Smart Projector Details
💵 See Samsung Freestyle 2nd Gen Smart Projector Price

For those considering alternatives, the BenQ HT2060 HDR Home Theater Projector distinguishes itself primarily through superior image performance. With 2,300 ANSI lumens (more than double the EF22's output), the BenQ delivers noticeably brighter images that remain vivid even in rooms with ambient light. Its exceptional 500,000:1 contrast ratio produces dramatically deeper blacks and more dimensional images, particularly beneficial for film enthusiasts watching dark scenes. Gamers will appreciate the BenQ's remarkably low 16.7ms input lag at 1080p/60Hz, providing a responsive experience that the Epson can't match for competitive or reflex-dependent games.
What the BenQ HT2060 gains in performance, however, it sacrifices in convenience and versatility. Unlike the Epson's all-in-one approach, the BenQ requires an external streaming device, adding to both cost and setup complexity. Its traditional form factor lacks the innovative 360-degree positioning flexibility of the EF22, and at nearly 8 pounds (compared to the Epson's 3.5 pounds), it's considerably less portable. With nearly identical pricing ($989 vs. $999), your choice ultimately depends on priorities: the BenQ delivers superior cinematic performance for dedicated home theaters, while the Epson offers unmatched convenience and flexibility for multi-purpose or casual viewing environments.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌BenQ HT2060 HDR Home Theater Projector Details
💵 See BenQ HT2060 HDR Home Theater Projector Price

The Anker Nebula Mars 3 approaches portable projection from a fundamentally different angle, with true go-anywhere functionality as its primary focus. The standout feature is its built-in battery, providing up to 5 hours of viewing in Eco mode or 2 hours at full brightness—something the EF22 simply cannot match. Its ruggedized design with IPX3 water resistance, drop protection, and dust resistance allows for worry-free outdoor use in environments that would be off-limits to the EF22. The Mars 3 also delivers significantly more powerful audio with its 40W 3-way speaker system that produces room-filling sound without external speakers, and it can even function as a power bank to charge other devices.
For users prioritizing versatility over absolute image quality, the Anker Nebula Mars 3 offers compelling value at a similar price point. While it can't match the EF22's contrast ratio or color accuracy in controlled environments, its AutoBright AI technology helps optimize performance in varied lighting conditions, and it can project larger images (up to 200" vs 150"). The tradeoffs come in the form of added weight (9.9 lbs vs 6.6 lbs) and slightly less refined image quality. The choice ultimately depends on usage patterns: if your projection needs extend beyond powered indoor environments—backyard movie nights, camping trips, or presentations in varied locations—the Mars 3's true portability delivers real-world benefits that the EF22 simply cannot provide.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Anker Nebula Mars 3 Outdoor Portable Projector Details
💵 See Anker Nebula Mars 3 Outdoor Portable Projector Price

The ASUS ZenBeam L2 distinguishes itself from the Epson EpiqVision Mini EF22 with its genuine portability and flexibility. Weighing just 1.57 kg (3.46 lbs) – nearly half the weight of the Epson – and featuring a built-in 65Wh battery that delivers up to 3.5 hours of playback, the ZenBeam L2 offers true freedom from power outlets. This makes it ideal for impromptu movie nights in the backyard, camping trips, or presentations in locations where power access is limited or inconvenient. The USB-C DisplayPort connectivity provides a simpler connection option for modern laptops with a single cable, and despite its more compact size, it still delivers impressive audio through its 10W Harman Kardon speaker.
Where the ZenBeam L2 falls short compared to the Epson is in pure performance metrics and integration. The ASUS ZenBeam L2 produces significantly less brightness (approximately 400 ANSI lumens vs. the Epson's 1,000 lumens), making it much more dependent on controlled lighting conditions to deliver a satisfying image. Its DLP technology, while offering good sharpness, can't match the color accuracy and contrast of the Epson's 3LCD laser system, and some users may notice the "rainbow effect" during fast-moving scenes. The external Android TV box, while functional, adds clutter compared to the Epson's integrated Google TV. At $799-899, it's more affordable than the Epson, making it the better value for those who prioritize portability over image quality, but less suitable for those looking to create a permanent home theater setup.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌ASUS ZenBeam L2 Smart Portable LED Projector Details
💵 See ASUS ZenBeam L2 Smart Portable LED Projector Price

For those seeking a more budget-friendly alternative to the Epson EF22, the TCL A1 Portable 1080p Smart Projector offers an entry point at exactly half the price—$499 versus $999. This compact projector distinguishes itself with surprisingly robust audio performance, featuring dual 8W speakers with Dolby Digital+ processing that actually outperform the Epson's 5W speakers in volume and richness. The TCL's innovative VersaGrip handle design serves double duty as both a carrying aid and an adjustable stand providing up to 15 degrees of tilt, making quick setup on uneven surfaces remarkably simple. Weighing just 5.5 pounds (versus the Epson's 6.6) and including a custom carrying case, the TCL embraces true portability for those who prioritize moving their projector between locations.
The most significant real-world compromise with the TCL A1 is its limited brightness—at 360 ISO lumens, it requires near-darkness to deliver satisfying image quality, whereas the Epson's 1000 lumens function adequately even with some ambient light present. This brightness limitation restricts when and where you can effectively use the projector, essentially confining it to nighttime viewing or rooms with blackout curtains. The TCL also lacks the Epson's advanced laser light source, relying instead on standard LED technology without a specified lifespan rating. For occasional movie nights in consistently dark environments, these limitations may be acceptable trade-offs for the substantial cost savings. However, users seeking flexibility for various lighting conditions or planning frequent use as a primary display will likely find the Epson's premium features justify its higher price despite the TCL's compelling value proposition.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌TCL A1 Portable 1080p Smart Projector Details
💵 See TCL A1 Portable 1080p Smart Projector Price

For those seeking a more traditional projector with superior brightness performance, the Optoma HZ40HDR 1080p Projector presents a compelling alternative to the Epson EF22. With its impressive 4,000 ANSI lumens output—four times the brightness of the EF22—the Optoma excels in environments with ambient light, making it suitable for daytime viewing or brightly lit rooms where the EF22 would struggle. Gaming enthusiasts will appreciate its remarkably low 8.6ms input lag at 1080p/120Hz, providing responsiveness comparable to gaming monitors and significantly outperforming the EF22 for fast-paced competitive gaming. The Optoma also offers a longer-rated laser light source (30,000 hours versus the EF22's 20,000 hours), potentially providing an additional 7 years of use under typical viewing conditions.
The tradeoff for this performance comes in both price and convenience. At approximately $1,299, the Optoma costs about $300 more than the EF22 and lacks integrated streaming capabilities, requiring an external device for accessing content services. Its traditional design and manual setup process demand more technical knowledge and effort to achieve optimal image placement and quality. While the Optoma can't match the EF22's plug-and-play simplicity or flexible placement options, it delivers superior raw performance that serious home theater enthusiasts and gamers will value—especially in spaces where light control is limited or where larger screen sizes are desired. For buyers who prioritize image brightness and gaming performance over smart features and setup convenience, the additional investment may be well justified.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Optoma HZ40HDR 1080p Projector Details
💵 See Optoma HZ40HDR 1080p Projector Price

When comparing this Epson to its competitors, the XGIMI Halo+ stands out primarily for its true portability. While the EF22 delivers superior brightness and color performance, the Halo+ offers something the Epson simply can't: a built-in battery providing up to 2.5 hours of cordless viewing. Weighing just 3.53 pounds (nearly half the EF22's weight), the Halo+ transforms where and how you can enjoy projected content—from backyard movie nights to camping trips—without requiring a power outlet. Its Intelligent Screen Adaptation with obstacle avoidance technology also represents a clever innovation, automatically detecting and adjusting the projection around objects like picture frames on your wall.
The value proposition of the XGIMI Halo+ becomes clear when considering its $150 lower price point ($849 vs. $999) alongside its added versatility. While it can't match the EF22's 1,000 lumens brightness (offering 700 ISO lumens instead) or the 360-degree rotating stand, the Halo+ delivers respectable image quality, especially in controlled lighting, plus Harman/Kardon tuned speakers in a genuinely portable package. For those who prioritize flexibility over maximum image quality or who frequently move between viewing locations, the Halo+ represents a compelling alternative that sacrifices some performance for significantly enhanced versatility.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌XGIMI Halo+ Portable Projector Details
💵 See XGIMI Halo+ Portable Projector Price

For those considering other options in Epson's compact projector lineup, the Epson EpiqVision Mini EF11 Laser Projector offers an interesting alternative at a more accessible $699 price point. Released in 2021, the EF11 delivers the same 1,000 lumens brightness and 1080p resolution as the EF22 in a significantly smaller and lighter package (just 2.7 pounds compared to 6.6 pounds). It retains Epson's excellent 3LCD laser technology for accurate colors and rainbow-free viewing, making it particularly compelling for users who prioritize ultimate portability without sacrificing core image quality.
Where the EF11 differs most notably is its streamlined approach - it lacks built-in streaming capabilities, HDR support, and the EF22's powerful audio system. Instead, the EF11 focuses on being a pure display device that pairs with your existing streaming equipment. This more traditional approach means a simpler user experience but requires additional external devices. For buyers who already own streaming devices they prefer and plan to use external audio anyway, the $300 savings might make more sense than paying for integrated features they won't utilize. The EF11's compact design also makes it particularly well-suited for those who need to transport their projector frequently between locations.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Epson EpiqVision Mini EF11 Laser Projector Details
💵 See Epson EpiqVision Mini EF11 Laser Projector Price

When considering alternatives to the Epson EpiqVision Mini EF22, the BenQ TH685P offers a dramatically different approach to home projection. With 3,500 ANSI lumens—more than triple the brightness of the Epson—the BenQ delivers usable images even in rooms with moderate ambient light, making it far more flexible for daytime viewing or spaces where complete light control isn't practical. Its standout 8.3ms input lag at 120Hz refresh rate places it among the most responsive projectors available at any price point, creating an experience that competitive gamers will appreciate immediately. This performance-focused approach extends to its 300-inch maximum screen size and dedicated gaming picture modes that enhance visibility in dark scenes.
However, the BenQ TH685P makes significant trade-offs to achieve these performance advantages. Unlike the Epson's all-in-one approach with built-in Google TV, the BenQ requires external streaming devices for content access. Its lamp-based light source needs replacement after 4,000-15,000 hours (depending on usage mode) compared to the Epson's maintenance-free 20,000-hour laser. While the BenQ's $799 price tag represents a $200 savings over the Epson upfront, the potential lamp replacement costs and less convenient setup (with manual focus and keystone adjustment) make it a better fit for users who prioritize raw performance metrics over convenience features. For dedicated gamers or those needing a projector that works well in challenging lighting conditions, these trade-offs may be entirely worthwhile.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌BenQ TH685P 1080p HDR Gaming Projector Details
💵 See BenQ TH685P 1080p HDR Gaming Projector Price

If you're considering alternatives to the Epson EpiqVision Mini EF22, the Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-FH02 offers a compelling option at a significantly lower price point of $599. The CO-FH02's standout feature is its impressive 3,000 lumens brightness—triple what the EF22 provides—making it substantially better for rooms with ambient light or daytime viewing. This brightness advantage means you won't need to completely darken your space to enjoy a vibrant image. The CO-FH02 also projects up to a massive 300 inches (compared to the EF22's 150-inch maximum) and weighs slightly less at 5.7 pounds, enhancing its portability for moving between rooms or taking to different locations.
However, there are notable tradeoffs compared to the EF22. The CO-FH02 uses a traditional lamp-based light source rated for 6,000-12,000 hours (versus the EF22's 20,000-hour maintenance-free laser), meaning you'll likely need to replace the lamp within 4-8 years of regular use. It also delivers less impressive contrast (16,000:1 compared to the EF22's 5,000,000:1), resulting in less dynamic image quality particularly in dark scenes. The CO-FH02's smart features come via an external Android TV dongle that occupies the single HDMI port, and its single 5W speaker can't match the EF22's superior audio system. For bright, flexible viewing environments where maximum value is a priority, the Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-FH02 makes a strong case—just be prepared to sacrifice some image quality and convenience features for the substantial cost savings.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-FH02 Smart Portable Projector Details
💵 See Epson EpiqVision Flex CO-FH02 Smart Portable Projector Price

When comparing alternatives, the BenQ TH575 1080p Gaming Projector stands out with its exceptional gaming performance and significantly higher brightness. At $649—about $350 less than the Epson—the BenQ delivers an impressive 3,800 ANSI lumens, making it far more suitable for rooms with ambient light where the EF22 might struggle. Its standout 16.7ms input lag provides a gaming experience that feels responsive and immediate, essentially eliminating the delay that can frustrate gamers using the Epson. If your primary needs include gaming or bright-room viewing and you're willing to forgo smart features, the BenQ represents excellent performance-per-dollar in these specific areas.
However, the BenQ makes clear trade-offs to achieve its lower price point. Unlike the maintenance-free laser technology in the Epson, the BenQ TH575 uses a traditional lamp that will eventually require replacement at additional cost. It lacks any built-in streaming capabilities, requiring an external device for content access. The BenQ also features a more utilitarian design with less installation flexibility, lacking the auto-setup features and 360-degree stand that make the Epson so easy to position. For buyers prioritizing gaming performance or maximum brightness on a tighter budget, these compromises may be entirely worthwhile, but they represent a fundamentally different approach to home projection than the all-in-one, lifestyle-focused experience the EpiqVision Mini EF22 delivers.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌BenQ TH575 1080p Gaming Projector Details
💵 See BenQ TH575 1080p Gaming Projector Price

When looking at alternatives to the Epson EpiqVision Mini EF22, the LG CineBeam Q 4K UHD Portable Laser Projector stands out with its true 4K resolution and remarkably compact form factor. At just 5.31" × 3.15" × 5.31" and 3.3 pounds, it's significantly more portable than the Epson while delivering four times the resolution with its XPR technology. The LG's RGB laser system produces an extraordinary color gamut covering 154% of the DCI-P3 color space, resulting in more vibrant and lifelike colors, particularly noticeable when viewing HDR content in a properly darkened room. Its premium build quality and rotating handle/stand design make it an appealing option for those who prioritize image quality and ultra-portability.
However, the CineBeam Q's advantages come with notable tradeoffs compared to the Epson. At $1,299 (about $300 more than the EF22), the LG delivers only half the brightness at 500 ANSI lumens, making it primarily suitable for completely darkened environments rather than versatile everyday use. Its single 3W mono speaker is inadequate for most viewing situations, essentially requiring external audio solutions, while the Epson's dual 5W speakers with Dolby Audio provide reasonable sound out of the box. For those with controlled lighting who prioritize image quality over brightness and are willing to use external speakers, the LG offers superior resolution and color reproduction in a more travel-friendly package—but for most everyday users seeking a TV alternative that works in various lighting conditions, the Epson provides better real-world versatility at a lower price point.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌LG CineBeam Q 4K UHD Portable Laser Projector Details
💵 See LG CineBeam Q 4K UHD Portable Laser Projector Price

The BenQ GV50 Full HD Smart Ceiling Projector takes a decidedly different approach from the Epson EF22, with specialized features that cater to specific use cases. Most notably, its 135° vertical tilt mechanism enables seamless ceiling projection—ideal for bedroom viewing while lying down—something the EF22 simply wasn't designed to do. The GV50 also embraces true portability with its built-in battery offering 2.5 hours of playback time, significantly more compact 4.6-pound design, and surprisingly robust 2.1 channel audio system with a dedicated 10W woofer that outperforms the Epson's speaker setup despite the $200 lower price point.
Where the GV50 falls short is brightness—at 500 ANSI lumens compared to the EF22's 1,000 lumens, it requires more controlled lighting conditions to shine. The BenQ GV50 also has a more limited maximum screen size of 100 inches versus the Epson's 150 inches. Ultimately, the GV50 represents better value if ceiling projection and portability are priorities, while the Epson EF22 remains superior for traditional living room setups where ambient light control is challenging and larger screen sizes are desired. Both share the same Google TV platform, so the decision really comes down to your specific viewing environment and mobility needs rather than smart features.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌BenQ GV50 Full HD Smart Ceiling Projector Details
💵 See BenQ GV50 Full HD Smart Ceiling Projector Price

For those considering alternatives to the Epson EF22, the WEMAX Vogue Pro ($640) offers compelling advantages at a significantly lower price point. With 1600 ANSI lumens compared to the Epson's 1000 lumens, the WEMAX delivers substantially better performance in rooms with ambient light, making it more versatile for multi-purpose living spaces rather than dedicated dark home theaters. Its 4-channel LED technology produces vibrant colors that rival the Epson's 3LCD system in most viewing conditions, while its more powerful dual 10W speakers with Dolby Audio and DTS-HD support provide fuller, richer sound without requiring external audio equipment. The WEMAX also excels with more comprehensive auto-calibration features including obstacle avoidance and screen alignment, plus expanded connectivity with two HDMI 2.1 ports and additional audio/video inputs.
Where the WEMAX Vogue Pro falls short is its Android-based Feng OS, which lacks the polish and comprehensive app support of the Epson's Google TV platform. The WEMAX's contrast ratio (2,500:1 vs Epson's 5,000,000:1) results in less impressive black levels in completely darkened rooms, though this difference becomes negligible with even minimal ambient light. It also doesn't match the Epson's flexible 360-degree stand design, requiring additional hardware for ceiling mounting. For budget-conscious buyers who prioritize brightness, audio quality, and connectivity over Google ecosystem integration, the WEMAX Vogue Pro delivers exceptional value with performance that exceeds its price point in real-world viewing environments.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌WEMAX Vogue Pro 1080P Smart Projector Details
💵 See WEMAX Vogue Pro 1080P Smart Projector Price

For buyers seeking a more budget-friendly option in Epson's EpiqVision Mini series, the Epson EpiqVision Mini EF21 Projector offers nearly identical core performance at a $100 lower price point. While it lacks the EF22's innovative 360-degree rotatable stand, the EF21 delivers the same 1080p resolution, 1,000 lumens brightness, HDR support, and 20,000-hour laser light source in a more compact package. Weighing just 5.1 pounds (versus the EF22's 6.6 pounds) and featuring smaller dimensions, the EF21 offers superior portability for those who frequently move their projector between rooms or locations.
The EF21 provides the same Google TV smart platform experience, built-in 5W stereo speakers, and connectivity options as its successor. Where it primarily differs is in placement flexibility—the EF21 uses a traditional fixed design that requires more conventional positioning relative to your viewing surface. For users with straightforward setup environments who don't need unusual projection angles, this limitation is unlikely to impact satisfaction, making the EF21's lower price point an attractive proposition. The EF21 also comes in different color options (Diamond White, Opal Green, and Quartz Rose) that may better complement certain home decor styles compared to the EF22's Stone Blue finish.
🤖 Read Detailed Comparison
👌Epson EpiqVision Mini EF21 Projector Details
💵 See Epson EpiqVision Mini EF21 Projector Price