TDL Studio 0.5 Bookshelf Loudspeakers Reviewed

By |

TDL Studio 0.5 Bookshelf Loudspeakers Reviewed


Bass versus size -- the age-old dilemma has been addressed in a number of ways, some successful and some (usually electronic) not so successful. And whatever the satellite system designers produce -- hidden subwoofers, for example -- British hi-fi enthusiasts seem to prefer one full-range enclosure per channel.

One of the best ways of squeezing a quart out of a pint has been the transmission line concept, a not-too-distant relative of the folded horn. Among the pioneers of this system was IMF, which metamorphosed into TDL, familiar to most readers for a range crowned by the huge Reference Standard. But TDL rewrote the books with the diminutive Studio 1, with a footprint and an overall space requirement matching that of yer garden variety two-way

Additional Resources

I have to admit that I was surprised at how well the Studio 1 worked, because I thought that the convoluted folds which make up a transmission line could be reduced only so far. But TDL has reduced the speaker even further -- in size and in price -- to produce a transmission line speaker tiny enough to be called 'cute'.

Before saying any more, I want you to be aware of the two most  relevant specs if this review is to have any meaning. First of all, the Studio 0.5 has a footprint of only 200x304mm (WxD) and its height is a mere 620mm. Add to this the dedicated stands and you increase it by only 70mm plus spikes. Best of all, though, is the price -- #399, plus #70 for the stands, the latter a perfect match in both sonic and aesthetic terms.

The Studio 0.5 looks like a junior TDL, a shrunken-down 'minilith' which still looks commanding in the all-black finish. The grille is black cloth stretched over a rigid frame, the
cut-outs large enough to preclude any edge diffraction. The box itself is finished in black ash veneer, with the back and baffle in black paint. With the grille removed, you'll see at the top a
ferro-fluid-controlled 25mm magnesium alloy tweeter, protected by a mesh dome and featuring a separate rear chamber.

Below this, its bottom edge situated roughly half-way up the baffle, is a 135mm doped polypropylene-coned woofer, tiny enough to look like it belongs in a Celestion 3-sized box. It features a phase plug sprouting from the centre and utilizes a Kapton  former, vented pole magnet and cast alloy chassis. At the very bottom are the two ports for the transmission line.

The back conatins two pairs of hefty binding posts in a recessed  area near the top; they accept bare wire, spade lugs or banana plugs, although they're too far apart for 19mm spaced pairs. Still, access is good and the barrels are large enough to provide  a good grip. The speakers arrive with solid core wire links, but bi-wiring offered such obvious improvements that I can't imagine why anyone would be so tight-fisted as to run these in
single-wire mode.

In addition to the clever carpentry, the secret of the 0.5 is the use of the long-throw woofer, which offers high power handling to compensate for the efficiency loss associated with trying to extract deep bass from a small enclosure. The Kapton voice coil former contributes higher power handling by virtue of its ability to withstand higher temperatures. The use of this non-metallic material also increases the electrical 'Q' of the driver. The phase plug is fitted to improve the transition from the bass/mid driver to the dome tweeter.

The crossover point for the 0.5 is at 3kHz, accomplished by a simple 5-element design incorporating the aforementioned bi-wiring capability. Other 'magic' wrought on this speaker
consists of a nice, safe nominal impedance of 6 ohms and a reasonable but not high sensitivity of 85dB. I used the speaker successfully with the Musical Fidelity B1 to see how it would fare with a budget amp, while I tested its limits with the far heftier Counterpoint SA-100.

Other products in the review system included the Basis turntable with SME Series V arm, Lyra Lydian cartridge, California Audio Labs Tempest II SE CD player, Counterpoint SA-1000 pre-amp and wire from Lieder, MasterLink, Space & Time, Sony, Audio-Technica, plus a few I won't name as they sounded unduly awful. The profusion of cables leads me straight to the primary curse which plagues this speaker.
Click to Page 2 for Setup, Critical Listening, and the Conclusion

HTR Product Rating for TDL Studio 0.5 Bookshelf Loudspeakers

Criteria Rating







Disagree with our product rating? Email us and tell us why you think this product should receive a higher rating.

Latest Floorstanding Speaker Reviews

Aug 12
Revel F328Be Floorstanding Speaker Review Brian says you'd be hard pressed to find a speaker that provides a more balanced, coherent, and nuanced presentation, especially at this price point, than the Revel F328Be.
Revel F328Be Floorstanding Speaker Review

Jun 10
MartinLogan Motion 20i Floorstanding Speakers Reviewed Recently, MartinLogan updated several models within the Motion Series product line, including three floorstanding models, the 60XTi, 40i, and 20i;...
MartinLogan Motion 20i Floorstanding Speakers Reviewed

Jun 01
Definitive Technology Demand Series Speaker System Reviewed Given their performance, aesthetics, and price, Definitive Technology's Demand series speakers set a very high bar, says Sean Killebrew.
Definitive Technology Demand Series Speaker System Reviewed

Apr 27
Laufer Teknik The Note Speaker System Reviewed In April 2019 at the AXPONA audio show, Sam Laufer, President of Laufer Teknik, introduced his company's newest speaker system,...
Laufer Teknik The Note Speaker System Reviewed

Mar 02
Revel F226Be Floorstanding Loudspeaker Reviewed A little over one year ago, Revel started shipping the first speaker from its PerformaBe line, the F228Be, which was...
Revel F226Be Floorstanding Loudspeaker Reviewed

Let's not mince words, huh? This speaker is so inordinately fussy for what should be an easy-to-use, upper-mass-market model that it will challenge any inveterate tweaker to near-breakdown. Maybe it's the metal dome tweeter, still an ornery device regardless of
its genuine potential, or maybe it's the strange dispersion pattern -- whatever, this speaker needs as much fine-tuning as any megabucks dipole, so don't expect to just slap a pair on the floor for maximum boogie-ness.

For starters, the 0.5 teeters on the edge of brightness, despite the copious amounts of bass which prevent it from sounding lightweight or top-heavy. If you used these in a blindfold test,
I'll guarantee that your buddies will think that they're hearing something the size of an Isobarik or a KEF 105. But this rich bottom end doesn't counterbalance a tizz which leads you to an
array of cables for fine-tuning purposes. Unless, of course, you're lucky enough to have a dozen amplifiers and sources at your disposal for producing a better match.

Item 1: Solid core and/or thin strand wire -- both of which I've always though were lousy, desperate solutions of the two-wrongs-don't-make-a-right variety -- aggravated the situation so much that I even substituted short lengths of my preferred multi-strand cable when assessing the speakers in single-wire form. I didn't want to gut the 0.5s to find out what was inside, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was solid core and/or thin-strand.

Item 2: Positioning is hypercritical, and not just in terms of toe-in, or proximity to the walls. More important than either is the amount of tilt you settle on, adjustable via the stands which
have spikes long enough to allow you to tilt the 0.5 back by a few necessary degrees. This is entirely dependent on the distance between the speaker and your listening seat, and it's as critical as the tilt factor of the Apogee Stage. The only way to accomplish this is by enlisting the help of a friend or two, so you can bark out orders from the hot seat. But it's worth it.

Once you've eliminated the potential for tizz, you're treated to a remarkably coherent sound, the bass-to-mid-to-treble transitions matching the Studio 1 for consistency. Don't ask me
why, but the speaker sound smoother when bi-wired, despite splitting the crossover, which does suggest that the links are inordinately critical when you're using a bi-wireable speaker in
single-wire mode. That inch or two of solid core...yecchh.

The bass quantity is tuned, as expected, according to the proximity to the walls. I wouldn't advise raising the speaker (above the level provided by the dedicated stand) as a substitute
for the tilt, because the height off the floor via the stand is ideal for bass quality, especially control. The tilting accomplishes one thing, focussing the image for more accurate and
therefore three-dimensional portrayal; although raising the speaker so that it fires at ear level would accomplish the same, it will compromise the bass. So, just as with the legendary
Hadcock arm, addressing one area of set-up is bound to butcher the perfection you've attained in another. To repeat myself:persist with the dedicated stand.

Once the ideal postioning has been achieved -- and I'd offer more advice, but this can only be done by ear and in the actual listening room -- you can ready yourself for amazement. Now I am not trying to set you up for an experience akin to listening to a tower full of Infinity 12in drivers, or a JBL Everest, or a Duntech. But you'll find that little can touch this baby at #399
when it comes to weight, slam, mass -- whatever you're looking for if you've embarked on a quest for more bass.

Regardless of what you think makes a speaker sound 'big' -- the mass provided by deep bass or dispersion which fills the space in front of the listener -- you'll be pleased to note that a
painstakingly installed pair of 0.5s can mimic some real monsters. Image height, when gauged from the listening seat with the tilt just so, isn't quite as convincing as with a pair of
Divas. But the 0.5, positioned with the tweeter some 6in below the height of my LS3/5As, matches that of my favourite BBC-approved giant killer. Stage width extends beyond the edges, as it should; try it with the James Boyk microphone test CD for proof. And depth? This baby could fool you into thinking it's a thoroughbred dipole.

But however good the spatial characteristics, the smooth midband and the clear treble (assuming you've paid heed to what I've written above), it's the bass quality which lifts this wa-a-ay above like-priced competition. Given that you'll hear these in a shop where the staff has taken the time to set them up with the ludicrous amounts of attention they demand, you'll be staggered by the extension, the solidity and the control. There's no fat at all when you're in the hot seat, though -- and I know this sounds weird -- they sound as flabby as an Isobarik off axis.

What the Studio 0.5 will not do is tempt those who think that controlled bass must be as tight as a drunk on New Year's Eve. The Studio 0.5 is rich, not dry, and the harmonics on acoustic
bass are liquid and flowing. What happens when you play bass derived from a keyboard hooked up via MIDI is that the edge is softened. I consider that a virtue, because it may even fool you into thinking that a musician rather than a computer operator made the recording, but those weaned on MC Hammer won't be amused. Fine, let them stick their heads in the bass bins down at the club.

I've gotta say it: my fetishistic love for the LS3/5A notwithstanding, I feel that the TDL Studio 0.5 is the best speaker you can buy for under #500. And if you add the stands to the #399, for a total of #469, you're left with #30 to buy that extra length of cable for bi-wiring while staying below the half-grand mark. If this speaker doesn't win some industry kudos, then the Oscars and the Booker prize won't stand alone as warped awards.

Additional Resources

  • Comment on this article

Post a Comment
comments powered by Disqus