- Editor's Note: Want to see a different product compared? Use the menu in the solid blue header above to swap a product.
Television technology has evolved dramatically over the past decade, and 2025 brings us to an interesting crossroads between competing premium display technologies. Today, we're comparing two of Samsung's most impressive offerings: the cutting-edge Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 and the highly acclaimed Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV.
The high-end TV market in 2025 is defined by several key technologies. Traditional LED TVs have largely been superseded by Mini-LED (branded as Neo QLED by Samsung) and OLED panels, each offering distinct advantages. Meanwhile, resolution has continued its march forward, with 8K challenging 4K as the new premium standard—though not without controversy about its practical benefits.
When considering a premium TV purchase, several factors should guide your decision. Picture quality remains paramount, but how that's achieved varies significantly between technologies. Processing power, especially AI-enhanced capabilities, has become increasingly important as TVs work harder to optimize content. And of course, value proposition matters—particularly when price differences can reach thousands of dollars.
The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV, released in early 2025, represents Samsung's absolute pinnacle of television technology. Priced at $5,499.99, it utilizes Mini-LED backlighting (thousands of tiny LEDs behind the screen) combined with Samsung's most advanced NQ8 AI Gen3 Processor. This flagship model introduces the innovative Wireless One Connect Box, eliminating the need for a physical cable between the connection hub and the display.
By contrast, the Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV was released in 2024 and represents Samsung's premium OLED offering. Typically retailing around $3,299.99 (though often available at significant discounts a year after release), it features Samsung's QD-OLED technology—a quantum dot enhanced OLED panel that addresses traditional OLED brightness limitations. Perhaps its most talked-about innovation is the groundbreaking anti-glare matte finish, a first for OLED displays.
Both TVs run Samsung's Tizen operating system and support a wide range of streaming services and smart home integrations, but they take fundamentally different approaches to delivering their premium experiences.
The core difference between these televisions lies in their underlying display technologies, and this impacts nearly every aspect of performance.
The QN990F Neo QLED uses Mini-LED backlighting, where thousands of tiny LEDs are arranged in precisely controlled dimming zones behind a quantum dot layer. This arrangement allows for extremely high brightness (likely exceeding 2,000 nits in highlights) while still maintaining good contrast through local dimming—where different screen areas can be brightened or darkened independently. While not achieving the perfect blacks of OLED, Mini-LED significantly reduces the "blooming" effect (where light bleeds around bright objects on dark backgrounds) compared to conventional LED backlights.
The S95D OLED takes a fundamentally different approach. Rather than using a backlight, each pixel in an OLED display generates its own light and can turn completely off for perfect blacks. Samsung's QD-OLED variant adds a quantum dot layer to enhance color volume and brightness compared to traditional OLED panels. The result is infinite contrast ratio (perfect blacks alongside bright highlights), though peak brightness typically tops out around 1,000-1,500 nits—still impressive for OLED but below Mini-LED capabilities.
I've viewed both technologies in various lighting conditions, and the differences are noticeable. The Neo QLED excels in bright rooms where its raw brightness can overcome ambient light, while the OLED creates a more dramatic image in controlled lighting with its perfect blacks and absence of blooming.
As for resolution, the difference between 8K (7680 × 4320 pixels) and 4K (3840 × 2160) is substantial on paper but requires consideration of viewing distance. At typical living room distances (7-10 feet from a 65" screen), many viewers won't discern individual pixels even on a 4K display. The 8K advantage becomes more apparent with larger screen sizes or closer viewing distances. I've found the resolution difference most noticeable with native 8K content when seated closer than 6 feet from the display.
Both TVs offer exceptional color performance, though through different means. The QN990F Neo QLED uses quantum dots to achieve nearly 100% coverage of the DCI-P3 color space (the standard used for digital cinema) and impressive HDR color volume thanks to its higher brightness. Samsung's 2025 quantum dot formulation likely offers incremental improvements in color accuracy compared to previous generations.
The S95D OLED combines OLED's pixel-level light control with quantum dot color enhancement, resulting in exceptionally vibrant yet accurate colors. Samsung claims Pantone validation for its color accuracy, meaning professional color standards are met out of the box. The S95D's advantage lies in how it renders subtle color gradations, particularly in near-black scenes where Mini-LED systems must compromise.
Both TVs support HDR10+ dynamic metadata, though neither offers Dolby Vision support (a competing HDR format favored by Netflix and some movie studios). In my experience, the Neo QLED's higher brightness creates more impactful HDR highlights, while the OLED delivers more nuanced shadow detail.
Motion clarity is crucial for sports and action content. The QN990F offers Motion Xcelerator 240Hz technology, enabling exceptionally smooth motion processing even with fast-moving objects. This is achieved through a native 120Hz panel combined with black frame insertion and sophisticated processing.
The S95D counters with Motion Xcelerator 144Hz and benefits from OLED's near-instantaneous pixel response time (less than 0.1ms, compared to several milliseconds for LCD-based displays), resulting in minimal motion blur. In practice, I've found OLED maintains clearer text when scrolling and shows less smearing during camera pans, though the Neo QLED's advanced processing helps narrow this gap.
For gaming, both TVs support variable refresh rate (VRR), auto low latency mode (ALLM), and other HDMI 2.1 gaming features. Input lag measurements likely favor the OLED slightly, though both are excellent gaming displays.
Viewing angle performance is where these technologies differ dramatically. The S95D OLED maintains consistent color and contrast at virtually any viewing angle, making it ideal for wider seating arrangements. The QN990F Neo QLED, despite improvements over traditional LED displays, still exhibits some contrast and color saturation loss when viewed from extreme angles.
For reflection handling, the S95D's revolutionary anti-glare matte finish was a game-changer for OLED technology when introduced. It diffuses ambient light reflections without significantly impacting image clarity, addressing a historical weakness of glossy OLED panels. The QN990F likely uses an advanced anti-reflection coating that performs very well, though differently—reducing the intensity of reflections rather than diffusing them.
In my experience with similar models, the S95D's matte finish creates a more comfortable viewing experience in rooms with windows or lamps opposite the screen, though the Neo QLED's superior brightness can sometimes overcome reflections through sheer luminance.
The processing capabilities of these TVs significantly impact their real-world performance, particularly with non-native content.
The QN990F features Samsung's NQ8 AI Gen3 Processor, which utilizes an astonishing 768 neural networks to analyze and optimize picture quality. This processing power is especially crucial for 8K displays, as the vast majority of content requires upscaling from 4K or lower resolutions. When watching 4K content on an 8K display, every original pixel must be intelligently expanded to four pixels on screen. Samsung's AI upscaling creates remarkably natural results, analyzing textures and patterns to recreate detail rather than simply enlarging the image.
The S95D employs the previous-generation NQ4 AI Gen2 Processor with 20 neural networks. While less computational power is required for 4K upscaling (from 1080p or 720p sources), the processor still handles significant tasks like noise reduction, contrast enhancement, and motion processing. In my observation, the difference in processing is most noticeable with lower-quality sources—the QN990F does a better job cleaning up compression artifacts from streaming content and broadcast TV.
Both TVs run Samsung's Tizen operating system, though the 2025 model likely features refinements in the interface. Samsung typically provides software updates for several years, so core functionality should remain similar, with both supporting major streaming services, voice assistants (Bixby, Alexa, and Google Assistant), and SmartThings home automation integration.
The physical design of these premium TVs reflects their technological differences. The QN990F Neo QLED features an impressively thin profile for an LED-based display, though not as thin as OLED. Its standout design element is the Wireless One Connect Box—an evolution of Samsung's external connection hub that now transmits all video and audio signals to the display wirelessly from up to 30 feet away. This innovation enables truly clean installations with only a power cable visible on the TV itself.
The S95D OLED showcases the inherent thinness of OLED technology (roughly 11mm at its thinnest points) with a wired One Connect Box that still offers excellent cable management. Both TVs feature nearly bezel-less designs with premium materials—likely aluminum bezels and bases.
Connectivity is comprehensive on both models, with multiple HDMI 2.1 ports supporting 4K 120Hz (and likely 8K 60Hz on the QN990F). Both include eARC for high-quality audio passthrough to external sound systems, along with optical digital outputs, Ethernet ports, and WiFi 6 or 6E wireless networking.
While external sound systems are recommended for truly cinematic experiences, both TVs offer impressive built-in audio by television standards.
The QN990F likely features an advanced implementation of Samsung's Object Tracking Sound technology, using multiple speakers positioned around the display to create three-dimensional sound that tracks on-screen action. With upward-firing speakers, it can deliver a reasonable approximation of Dolby Atmos height effects without requiring a separate sound system.
The S95D includes Object Tracking Sound+, which similarly attempts to create spatial audio from the TV's integrated speakers. In my experience with similar Samsung models, these systems perform admirably for dialogue clarity and casual viewing but still fall short of dedicated sound systems for dynamic range and impact.
Both TVs support Q-Symphony, a Samsung-specific feature that allows the TV speakers to work in conjunction with compatible Samsung soundbars rather than being disabled when an external audio system is connected.
The price difference between these TVs is substantial. At $5,499.99, the QN990F Neo QLED 8K commands a premium of approximately $2,200 over the typical retail price of the S95D OLED—and potentially much more when the OLED is discounted (as last-generation models often are).
This price differential raises important value questions. The QN990F offers three significant advantages: higher resolution, potentially greater brightness, and newer processing technology. However, these benefits must be weighed against their practical impact for your viewing environment and content consumption.
For movie enthusiasts with controlled lighting who primarily watch 4K content (which includes virtually all streaming services and physical media currently available), the S95D OLED offers exceptional picture quality at a significantly lower price point. The infinite contrast ratio and perfect pixel-level control often create a more dramatic and immersive image, particularly with cinematic content.
For those with very bright rooms, varied content consumption including daytime sports viewing, or particular concern about static image retention, the QN990F Neo QLED offers compelling advantages—though buyers must decide whether these justify the substantial price premium.
In a dedicated home theater environment with controlled lighting, the S95D OLED has a slight edge for movie viewing. The perfect blacks create a more cinematic experience, particularly during letterboxed movies where black bars completely disappear into a darkened room. The wider viewing angles also ensure consistent picture quality for every seat.
However, the QN990F counters with potentially superior HDR impact through its higher brightness capabilities and 8K resolution that could better reproduce fine details in high-quality sources. For viewers who sit closer than THX-recommended distances or use larger screens, this additional resolution might be noticeable and appreciated.
Both TVs excel as gaming displays, supporting 4K 120Hz input, variable refresh rates, and auto low latency modes. The S95D OLED offers slightly faster response times and potentially lower input lag, which can be advantageous for competitive gaming. The QN990F likely supports 4K at 240Hz with compatible PC setups, which could benefit esports enthusiasts with high-end gaming rigs.
Neither TV will disappoint for gaming, though the risk of burn-in from static HUD elements in games played for extended periods remains a theoretical concern for OLED technology, even with Samsung's mitigation technologies.
For households where TV viewing commonly occurs in bright daylight conditions, the QN990F Neo QLED holds a significant advantage. Its substantially higher brightness can overcome ambient light more effectively, maintaining contrast and color saturation even with sunlight in the room. While the S95D's matte finish helps reduce distracting reflections, it can't match the Neo QLED's ability to "punch through" ambient light with sheer luminance.
When investing in premium televisions, longevity considerations are important. The QN990F Neo QLED has an advantage regarding potential burn-in or image retention. While modern OLEDs include multiple features to mitigate this risk, including pixel refreshing algorithms and screen savers, the fundamental physics of organic compounds means some risk remains for viewers who watch content with static elements for extremely extended periods (think news channel logos or game HUDs for many hours daily over years).
Conversely, the S95D OLED avoids the potential for LED backlights to develop uneven aging or brightness over time. Both technologies should provide many years of excellent performance under normal viewing conditions.
From a future-proofing perspective, 8K resolution provides some advantage as content eventually catches up to the technology, though this transition will likely take several more years for mainstream adoption.
Choosing between the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV and the Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV ultimately comes down to your specific viewing environment, content preferences, and budget considerations.
Consider the QN990F Neo QLED if:
Choose the S95D OLED if:
The final decision framework should consider your room environment first and foremost. In very bright rooms, the Neo QLED's advantages become more pronounced, while in controlled lighting, the OLED's perfect contrast may provide a more cinematic experience.
Next, consider your typical content. If you're primarily streaming movies and TV shows (currently almost exclusively available in 4K at most), the immediate benefits of 8K are limited. However, if you're an early adopter who wants to future-proof your purchase, the QN990F offers that advantage.
Finally, assess your budget honestly. The S95D OLED delivers extraordinary picture quality at a significantly lower price point than the QN990F Neo QLED. For many viewers, it may represent the sweet spot of premium performance and value, while the QN990F stands as the cost-no-object choice for those demanding absolutely everything current TV technology can offer.
| Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 | Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV |
|---|---|
| Display Technology - Fundamentally different approaches to creating an image | |
| Neo QLED (Mini-LED backlight with quantum dots) | QD-OLED (Self-emissive pixels with quantum dot layer) |
| Resolution - Determines maximum detail, though visible difference depends on viewing distance | |
| 8K (7680 × 4320) - Future-proofed but limited native content | 4K (3840 × 2160) - Current standard with abundant content |
| Peak Brightness - Critical for HDR impact and viewing in bright rooms | |
| Extremely high (2,000+ nits estimated) | Good for OLED (1,000-1,500 nits estimated) |
| Black Levels - Determines contrast and scene depth | |
| Very good (Mini-LED local dimming) but not perfect | Perfect blacks (pixels turn completely off) |
| Processor - Handles upscaling and picture enhancement | |
| NQ8 AI Gen3 (768 neural networks) | NQ4 AI Gen2 (20 neural networks) |
| Anti-Glare Technology - Affects visibility in bright environments | |
| Advanced anti-reflective coating | Revolutionary matte finish (first for OLED) |
| Viewing Angles - Important for wide seating arrangements | |
| Good but degrades at extreme angles | Excellent at virtually any angle |
| Gaming Features - Affects responsiveness and compatibility | |
| 4K@240Hz, VRR, ALLM, low input lag (~10ms) | 4K@144Hz, VRR, ALLM, very low input lag (~9ms) |
| One Connect Box - For cable management and clean installation | |
| Wireless (industry first) | Wired (separate connection hub) |
| Burn-In Risk - Long-term durability concern | |
| None (LED technology not susceptible) | Low with modern protections, but not eliminated |
| Audio Technology - Built-in sound quality | |
| Object Tracking Sound Pro with top-channel speakers | Object Tracking Sound+ with spatial audio |
| Price - Value consideration | |
| $5,499.99 (premium for cutting-edge technology) | $3,299.99 typical retail (often available at significant discounts) |
| Best For - Primary use case recommendation | |
| Very bright rooms, early tech adopters, viewers wanting future-proof 8K | Movie enthusiasts, controlled lighting environments, viewers prioritizing value and contrast |
For movie watching, the Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV generally provides a more cinematic experience with its perfect black levels and infinite contrast ratio. This creates more depth in dark scenes and makes letterbox bars completely disappear in dimmed rooms. However, the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 offers significantly higher brightness for HDR highlights, which can enhance certain cinematic moments. For dedicated home theater setups with controlled lighting, most cinephiles prefer the S95D OLED for its superior contrast performance.
For most viewers, 8K resolution in the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 doesn't justify the substantial price premium over the 4K Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV. At typical viewing distances (7-10 feet) on a 65" screen, the difference between 4K and 8K is minimal to imperceptible for most content. Additionally, native 8K content remains extremely limited in 2025. The 8K resolution of the QN990F becomes more valuable for larger screen sizes (75" and above) or for viewers who sit unusually close to their televisions.
The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 significantly outperforms the Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV in very bright rooms. The Neo QLED's Mini-LED backlight can achieve much higher brightness levels (likely exceeding 2,000 nits versus 1,000-1,500 for the OLED), allowing it to overcome ambient light more effectively. While the S95D features an innovative anti-glare matte finish that reduces reflections, it can't match the raw brightness output of the QN990F for daytime viewing in sun-filled spaces.
Both TVs excel for gaming, but offer different advantages. The Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV provides slightly lower input lag (approximately 9ms) and near-instantaneous pixel response times, eliminating motion blur in fast-paced games. The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 supports higher refresh rates (up to 4K at 240Hz with compatible PC setups) and eliminates any risk of burn-in from static game HUDs. Competitive gamers might prefer the S95D for its faster response, while those concerned about burn-in or wanting the highest possible refresh rates might choose the QN990F.
The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 and Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV likely have comparable overall lifespans under normal viewing conditions, but with different considerations. The Neo QLED has no risk of burn-in, which gives it an advantage for displaying static content for extended periods. Modern OLED TVs like the S95D include multiple protections against burn-in, making it a rare occurrence with normal usage, but the theoretical risk remains for displays showing the same static elements (like news tickers or game HUDs) for many hours daily over several years.
The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 at $5,499.99 is approximately $2,200 more expensive than the Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV at its typical retail price of $3,299.99. The price gap often widens further as the S95D frequently receives discounts as a previous model year product. This substantial price difference makes the S95D OLED a significantly better value for most consumers, unless specific features of the QN990F like 8K resolution or wireless connectivity are essential to your setup.
The Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV delivers significantly better viewing angles than the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025. OLED technology maintains consistent color accuracy and contrast even at extreme off-center viewing positions, making the S95D ideal for wide seating arrangements where some viewers may be sitting at angles to the screen. While the QN990F has improved viewing angles compared to traditional LED TVs, it still shows some color saturation and contrast loss when viewed from far to the sides.
Both the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 and Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV feature One Connect Box technology, but with a key difference. The QN990F introduces the Wireless One Connect Box, which eliminates the need for any visible cables between the connection hub and the display—only power cords are required for each component. The S95D uses a wired One Connect Box that still requires a single cable connecting to the TV. Both systems make wall mounting cleaner and simplify access to ports, but the QN990F's wireless solution represents the cleanest possible installation.
Both the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 and Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV run on Samsung's Tizen smart platform with nearly identical streaming capabilities and app support. The QN990F may have minor interface refinements and slightly faster navigation due to its newer processor. Both TVs support all major streaming services, voice assistants (Bixby, Alexa, Google Assistant), and SmartThings home automation integration. Smart features should not be a deciding factor between these models as the core experience remains very similar on both the QN990F and S95D.
For sports viewing, the choice between the Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 and Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV depends on your viewing environment. For daytime sports in bright rooms, the Neo QLED's superior brightness makes it the better choice, maintaining vibrant colors and contrast even with ambient light. For evening viewing in controlled lighting, the OLED's perfect motion clarity (due to nearly instantaneous pixel response times) gives it an edge for following fast action. The QN990F is generally preferred for daytime sports, while the S95D might have a slight advantage for night games in dimmer settings.
The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 and Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV offer different HDR strengths. The Neo QLED delivers more impactful HDR highlights due to its significantly higher peak brightness, making explosions, sunlight, and other bright elements pop more dramatically. The OLED provides better shadow detail and contrast in darker HDR scenes due to its perfect black levels and pixel-level light control. For overall HDR impact in typical viewing environments, many enthusiasts prefer the QN990F's brightness advantage, though cinephiles often value the S95D's superior contrast and shadow detail.
The Samsung 65" Neo QLED QN990F 8K Smart TV 2025 likely has slightly better built-in audio than the Samsung 65" S95D 4K OLED Smart TV, with its more advanced Object Tracking Sound Pro system featuring top-channel speakers for height effects. Both TVs offer Samsung's spatial audio technology that attempts to match sound to on-screen action, but the flagship QN990F receives Samsung's latest audio enhancements. That said, the difference isn't dramatic, and serious home theater enthusiasts will want to pair either TV with a dedicated sound system or soundbar for truly cinematic audio experiences that surpass what either the QN990F or S95D can produce on their own.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: samsung.com - abt.com - bestbuy.com - pcnation.com - samsung.com - videoandaudiocenter.com - exertisalmo.com - displayspecifications.com - theapplianceplug.com - news.samsung.com - techradar.com - videoandaudiocenter.com - avsforum.com - cnet.com - abt.com - merlinstv.com - nfm.com - rtings.com - flintsfurniture.com - samsung.com - bestbuy.com - displayspecifications.com
