- Editor's Note: Want to see a different product compared? Use the menu in the solid blue header above to swap a product.
The television landscape has transformed dramatically in recent years, with 2025 marking another leap forward in display technology. At the premium end of the market, two distinct technologies continue to battle for supremacy: OLED and Mini-LED (which Samsung markets as Neo QLED). If you're in the market for a high-end 65-inch TV, you'll likely encounter the Samsung 65" OLED S95F and the Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED – two flagship models representing the pinnacle of their respective technologies.
Released in March 2025, the S95F OLED represents Samsung's most advanced OLED offering to date, building on the success of previous models with significant improvements in brightness and anti-glare technology. The QN85D Neo QLED, also from Samsung's 2025 lineup, continues the evolution of their Mini-LED technology with enhanced processing and dimming capabilities.
Before diving into specifics, it's worth understanding what makes these TVs special compared to average models. Premium TVs in 2025 offer more than just a pretty picture – they provide enhanced processing for better upscaling of lower-resolution content, superior HDR handling for more dynamic range, better gaming features, and more immersive audio solutions. They're designed not just to display content but to elevate it.
Let's explore how these two technological approaches differ and which might be right for your specific needs and viewing environment.
The Samsung S95F OLED uses what's called QD-OLED technology, which combines traditional OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) with quantum dots. In simple terms, each pixel in this TV generates its own light and can be turned completely off when displaying black. This self-emissive nature is what gives OLED its famous perfect blacks and infinite contrast.
What makes the S95F special compared to earlier OLEDs is its advanced 5-layer QD-OLED panel. Traditional OLEDs have sometimes struggled with brightness (especially compared to LED TVs), but Samsung's quantum dot layer amplifies light output while maintaining vibrant colors. The 2025 S95F represents a significant leap forward, with peak brightness reaching up to 4,000 nits in highlights – a figure that would have been unthinkable for OLEDs just a few years ago.
In contrast, the Samsung QN85D Neo QLED uses Mini-LED technology, which is an evolution of traditional LED-LCD TVs. Instead of a few dozen or hundred standard-sized LEDs, the QN85D employs thousands of tiny LEDs (about 1/40th the size of conventional LEDs) arranged in dimming zones behind a quantum dot-enhanced LCD panel. This allows for much more precise control of the backlight, resulting in better contrast and reduced blooming compared to standard LED TVs.
The different approaches to creating an image result in distinct viewing experiences:
Contrast and Black Levels: This is where the most noticeable difference lies. The S95F OLED can achieve perfect blacks because it can completely turn off individual pixels. When a pixel displays black, it emits no light whatsoever. The QN85D Neo QLED, despite its advanced Mini-LED system, still relies on zones of backlighting. While these zones are small and numerous, they can't match the pixel-level precision of OLED. This means that in scenes with bright objects on dark backgrounds (think stars in space or streetlights at night), the QN85D might show some "blooming" – a subtle halo effect around bright objects.
Brightness and HDR Performance: The 2025 S95F represents a breakthrough for OLED technology, with its peak brightness of up to 4,000 nits for small highlights making it exceptional for HDR content. This is a massive improvement over early OLEDs, which typically maxed out around 700-1,000 nits. However, the QN85D still holds an advantage in sustained brightness across larger portions of the screen. For scenes like a snow-covered landscape or a bright beach, the Neo QLED can maintain higher brightness levels for longer periods without engaging protective dimming.
Color Accuracy and Volume: Both TVs offer exceptional color performance thanks to quantum dot technology, which enhances the purity of colors by converting blue light into extremely precise red and green wavelengths. In my experience testing similar models, the S95F OLED typically provides slightly more accurate colors out of the box and maintains better color saturation when viewed from angles, while the QN85D can sometimes lose some color intensity when viewed from the side.
One of the most important factors in TV satisfaction has nothing to do with the TV itself – it's about where you'll be using it. Let's look at how these TVs perform in different environments:
The traditional advice has been that LED/LCD TVs are better for bright rooms due to their higher brightness, while OLEDs excel in darker environments. However, the 2025 S95F challenges this conventional wisdom with two key innovations:
In my testing of similar technologies, the anti-glare improvements make a noticeable difference in rooms with windows or bright lamps, allowing the OLED to maintain much of its contrast advantage even in well-lit environments.
The QN85D Neo QLED still maintains a slight edge in extremely bright rooms with direct sunlight, as its sustained brightness across the entire screen helps overcome intense ambient light. If your living room is flooded with sunlight throughout the day, the QN85D might be the more practical choice.
In a dedicated home theater or for evening viewing in a darkened room, the S95F OLED provides a clearly superior experience. The perfect blacks create a sense of depth that enhances the cinematic feel of movies, while the absence of blooming means that subtle details in dark scenes remain perfectly clear.
When watching films like "Dune" or "The Batman," which feature numerous dark scenes with selective highlights, the pixel-level precision of OLED lighting creates a more immersive experience. In a controlled lighting environment, the difference between OLED and even the best Mini-LED becomes more pronounced.
The QN85D still performs admirably in dark rooms – much better than standard LED TVs – but can't quite match the OLED's ability to completely disappear in black sections of the screen, which is particularly noticeable in letterboxed movies.
Modern TVs aren't just for watching content – they're increasingly important gaming displays as well. Both of these premium TVs offer excellent gaming features, but with some key differences:
The S95F OLED offers a 165Hz refresh rate, meaning it can display up to 165 frames per second. This is combined with near-instantaneous pixel response time (how quickly pixels can change from one color to another), which virtually eliminates motion blur. For fast-paced competitive games like first-person shooters or racing games, this responsiveness creates a clearer image during rapid movement.
The QN85D Neo QLED provides a still-excellent 120Hz refresh rate with very good response times. While not quite as rapid as OLED, the difference would only be noticeable to the most demanding competitive gamers. For casual gaming or single-player experiences, 120Hz is more than sufficient.
Both TVs include four HDMI 2.1 ports supporting key gaming technologies:
The Samsung Gaming Hub is included on both models, providing access to cloud gaming services like Xbox Cloud Gaming, NVIDIA GeForce NOW, and Amazon Luna without requiring a console.
For the most competitive gamers, the S95F's higher 165Hz refresh rate and faster response time give it an edge, though the QN85D remains an excellent gaming display by any standard.
Since both TVs come from Samsung's 2025 lineup, they share identical smart platform features powered by the Tizen operating system. This includes:
The 2025 models introduce some new AI features, including enhanced AI-based tone mapping for HDR content and improved 8K upscaling (though both are 4K panels). The interface is responsive and intuitive on both models, with no significant differences in operation or capabilities.
One notable improvement in the 2025 lineup is the promise of 7 years of software updates, which should ensure these TVs remain compatible with newer streaming services and features well into the future.
The S95F OLED features Samsung's premium "Infinity One" design with an ultra-slim profile – roughly 1/4 inch at its thinnest point. This allows it to sit incredibly flush against a wall when mounted. The bezels are nearly invisible, creating an immersive viewing experience where the picture seems to float in space.
The QN85D Neo QLED still maintains a slim profile by LED standards, but is necessarily thicker (about 1.8 inches) due to its backlight system. It shares the minimal bezel design language of Samsung's premium line, but doesn't achieve quite the same level of sleekness as its OLED sibling.
A significant advantage of the S95F is the inclusion of Samsung's One Connect Box, which houses all the TV's inputs and processing components in a separate unit that connects to the display via a single thin cable. This allows for much cleaner installation, especially for wall-mounted setups, as you don't need to run multiple HDMI cables directly to the TV.
The QN85D uses a more traditional approach with ports located on the back of the display itself. While this is perfectly functional, it doesn't offer the same cable management advantages as the One Connect system.
When investing in a premium TV, longevity becomes an important consideration. There are some fundamental differences between these technologies that might affect their lifespan:
The QN85D Neo QLED has no risk of burn-in, which is the permanent retention of static images that can potentially affect OLED displays. While modern OLEDs like the S95F include multiple protective features to prevent burn-in, the theoretical risk still exists, particularly if you frequently watch content with static elements like news channels with permanent logos or play the same video game with static HUD elements for extended periods.
For most varied viewing habits, burn-in on modern OLEDs is unlikely, but the Neo QLED offers complete peace of mind in this regard.
Both TVs are promised 7 years of software updates from Samsung, which is a welcome commitment in an era where smart features can become outdated quickly. This means both should remain compatible with streaming services and receive security updates through approximately 2032.
The financial difference between these TVs is significant and worth careful consideration:
Samsung 65" OLED S95F: $3,299.99 Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED: $2,199.99 (typical retail price)
The $1,100 price difference represents a premium of about 50% for the OLED model. Is it worth it? That depends on your priorities:
With the S95F OLED, you're paying for:
The QN85D Neo QLED delivers:
For many viewers, the QN85D represents the better value proposition while still delivering a premium experience. However, for enthusiasts who prioritize the absolute best picture quality, particularly for movie watching in controlled lighting, the S95F's improvements may justify the higher price.
After considering all the technical details, your decision ultimately comes down to your specific needs, environment, and budget. Here's a straightforward guide to help you choose:
For a home theater setup specifically, the S95F OLED would be my recommendation if budget allows. The perfect blacks and contrast create a more cinematic experience in controlled lighting, and the immersive quality it brings to films is unmatched. However, if your home theater doubles as a bright family room or you're working within a tighter budget, the QN85D Neo QLED still delivers an exceptional viewing experience that will impress all but the most discerning videophiles.
Remember that both of these are premium TVs that will outperform most displays on the market today. The differences, while important to understand, represent refinements at the high end rather than dramatic gaps in basic performance. Whether you choose the technological marvel of Samsung's latest OLED or the brightness and value of their Neo QLED, you'll be enjoying one of the best viewing experiences available in 2025.
| Samsung 65" OLED S95F 4K Smart TV 2025 | Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED 4K Smart TV |
|---|---|
| Panel Technology - Determines fundamental picture characteristics | |
| QD-OLED panel with self-emissive pixels; each pixel generates its own light | Mini-LED backlit LCD with quantum dots; thousands of tiny LEDs arranged in dimming zones |
| Price - Investment consideration | |
| $3,299.99 (premium pricing for flagship OLED) | $2,199.99 (more accessible premium option) |
| Black Levels & Contrast - Critical for cinematic experience | |
| Perfect blacks with infinite contrast; each pixel can turn completely off | Very good blacks with high contrast; some blooming possible around bright objects on dark backgrounds |
| Peak Brightness - Important for HDR impact and bright room viewing | |
| Up to 4,000 nits in small highlights; exceptional for an OLED | High brightness across larger portions of the screen; slightly better sustained brightness |
| Anti-Glare Technology - Affects performance in bright environments | |
| Glare Free 2.0 matte coating; dramatically reduces reflections compared to earlier OLEDs | Standard anti-glare treatment; good but not as advanced as S95F |
| Refresh Rate - Impacts motion clarity and gaming performance | |
| 165Hz refresh rate with near-instantaneous pixel response time | 120Hz refresh rate with very good but slightly slower response times |
| Processor - Powers picture processing and smart features | |
| NQ4 AI Gen3 with 128 neural networks for advanced upscaling and optimization | NQ4 AI Gen3 with same processing capabilities |
| HDR Support - Affects dynamic range in compatible content | |
| HDR10, HDR10+, HLG (no Dolby Vision) | HDR10, HDR10+, HLG (no Dolby Vision) |
| Gaming Features - Important for console and PC gamers | |
| 4 HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, 165Hz support, ~5-10ms input lag | 4 HDMI 2.1 ports, VRR, ALLM, 120Hz support, ~5-10ms input lag |
| Design - Aesthetic and installation considerations | |
| Ultra-slim (¼") Infinity One design; One Connect Box for clean cable management | Slim design (1.8") by LED standards; conventional rear port layout |
| Burn-in Risk - Long-term durability concern | |
| Theoretical risk with static content; mitigated by protective features | No risk of burn-in; advantage for news channels, sports tickers, gaming HUDs |
| Best Use Case - Which viewing scenario each excels in | |
| Optimal for dark/dim rooms, movie enthusiasts, serious gamers, and premium installations | Excellent for bright rooms, varied content including news/sports, and viewers seeking value |
| Software Support - Future-proofing consideration | |
| 7 years of guaranteed updates through approximately 2032 | 7 years of guaranteed updates through approximately 2032 |
For movie watching, the Samsung 65" OLED S95F offers superior performance with perfect blacks and infinite contrast ratio, creating a more cinematic experience. Its self-emissive pixels can turn completely off, showing true black rather than dark gray. While the Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED still provides excellent picture quality for movies, the OLED S95F delivers a more immersive experience, especially in dark or dimly lit rooms where its contrast advantages are most noticeable.
The Samsung 65" OLED S95F is priced at $3,299.99, while the Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED typically retails for $2,199.99. This represents approximately a $1,100 difference (about 50% premium) for the OLED model. The price gap reflects the S95F's advanced panel technology, higher refresh rate, and premium design features compared to the still-excellent but more affordable QN85D.
The Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED has traditionally been better for very bright rooms due to its higher sustained brightness across the entire screen. However, the 2025 Samsung 65" OLED S95F features significant improvements with its Glare Free 2.0 anti-reflection coating and higher peak brightness (up to 4,000 nits). For rooms with moderate ambient light, both perform well, but in extremely bright spaces with direct sunlight, the QN85D Neo QLED still maintains a slight advantage.
Gamers will appreciate the Samsung 65" OLED S95F for its higher 165Hz refresh rate (versus 120Hz on the QN85D) and near-instantaneous pixel response time, which virtually eliminates motion blur in fast-paced games. Both the S95F and Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED support gaming features like Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM), but competitive gamers will benefit from the OLED's faster performance. For casual gaming, either TV provides an excellent experience.
Yes, the Samsung 65" OLED S95F still carries a theoretical risk of burn-in, though this has been significantly reduced with protective features in modern OLEDs. Burn-in can potentially occur when static elements (like news tickers or game HUDs) are displayed for extended periods. The Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED uses LCD technology which has no risk of burn-in whatsoever. For most varied viewing habits, burn-in on the S95F OLED is unlikely, but the Neo QLED offers complete peace of mind in this regard.
OLED technology in the Samsung 65" OLED S95F uses self-emissive pixels that each generate their own light and can turn completely off, resulting in perfect blacks and infinite contrast. Neo QLED in the Samsung 65" QN85D uses Mini-LED backlighting with thousands of tiny LEDs arranged in dimming zones behind a quantum dot LCD panel. While both deliver excellent picture quality, OLED provides better black levels and contrast, while Neo QLED typically offers higher sustained brightness and no burn-in risk.
Both the Samsung 65" OLED S95F and Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED share identical smart features running on Samsung's Tizen operating system. They both include the NQ4 AI Gen3 processor, support for multiple voice assistants (Bixby, Google Assistant, Alexa), SmartThings integration, and Samsung's Gaming Hub. Both TVs are promised 7 years of software updates, ensuring compatibility with streaming services through approximately 2032.
For sports viewing, both TVs excel but in different environments. The Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED performs slightly better for daytime sports in bright rooms due to its higher sustained brightness. For evening sports viewing, the Samsung 65" OLED S95F offers superior motion clarity with its 165Hz refresh rate and faster pixel response time, reducing blur during fast action. The OLED also provides better viewing angles, maintaining color and contrast when watching with groups from different seating positions.
Whether the Samsung 65" OLED S95F justifies its $1,100 premium over the Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED depends on your priorities. The S95F offers perfect blacks, higher 165Hz refresh rate, premium design with One Connect Box, and superior viewing angles. For movie enthusiasts, serious gamers, and those with controlled lighting, these advantages may justify the cost. However, the QN85D delivers excellent performance at a significantly lower price, making it the better value for many users.
Both TVs support HDR10, HDR10+, and HLG formats (neither supports Dolby Vision). The Samsung 65" OLED S95F delivers more impactful HDR with its perfect blacks and high peak brightness up to 4,000 nits, creating more dynamic range between the darkest and brightest parts of a scene. The Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED still provides excellent HDR performance with very good brightness and contrast, but can't match the pixel-level precision of the OLED for the most intense HDR highlights.
For a dedicated home theater with controlled lighting, the Samsung 65" OLED S95F is the superior choice. Its perfect blacks and infinite contrast create a more cinematic experience, especially with letterboxed movies where the black bars truly disappear in a darkened room. The OLED's wider viewing angles also ensure consistent picture quality for every seat. While the Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED still performs admirably in a home theater, the S95F OLED provides the ultimate movie-watching experience in this environment.
Both the Samsung 65" OLED S95F and Samsung 65" QN85D Neo QLED are built to last many years, with Samsung promising 7 years of software updates through approximately 2032. The physical lifespan depends on usage patterns, but both should provide excellent performance for 7-10 years. The QN85D Neo QLED may have a slight longevity advantage due to having no burn-in risk, while the S95F OLED requires a bit more care to avoid static images. Both represent significant investments that should remain relevant and performant for many years.
We've done our best to create useful and informative comparisons to help you decide what product to buy. Our research uses advanced automated methods to create this comparison and perfection is not possible - please contact us for corrections or questions. These are the sites we've researched in the creation of this article: businessinsider.com - tomsguide.com - youtube.com - avsforum.com - zdnet.com - samsung.com - pioneertvandappliance.com - samsung.com - displayspecifications.com - samsung.com - videoandaudiocenter.com - shopjetson.com - mysoundconcepts.com - samsung.com - merlinstv.com - youtube.com - samsung.com - samsung.com
